share_log

Is Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) A Risky Investment?

Is Carpenter Technology (NYSE:CRS) A Risky Investment?

卡朋特科技(纽交所:CRS)是一项有风险的投资吗?
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 10:46

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Carpenter Technology Corporation (NYSE:CRS) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性与风险远非同义词。” 在考虑一家公司有多大的风险时,考虑到它的资产负债表是很自然的,因为当公司破产时常常会涉及到债务。我们注意到卡朋特科技股份有限公司(纽交所:CRS)在其资产负债表上确实有债务。 但是这些债务是否令股东担忧呢?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什么时候负债才是一个问题?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业增长的一种工具,但如果一个企业无法偿还债务,那么它就完全受制于债权人。如果情况变得非常糟糕,债权人可以接管企业。然而,一个更常见的(但仍然痛苦的)情况是,企业不得不以低价筹集新的股权资本,从而永久性地稀释股东的股份。当然,债务可以成为企业的重要工具,特别是重资产的企业。当我们考虑一个公司的债务使用时,首先看的是现金和债务的总和。

What Is Carpenter Technology's Debt?

卡朋特科技的债务是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Carpenter Technology had US$693.9m of debt in March 2024, down from US$801.3m, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$53.5m, its net debt is less, at about US$640.4m.

您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但它显示卡朋特科技在2024年3月有693.9百万美元的债务,比一年前的801.3百万美元下降。 然而,由于保有5,350万美元的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为640.4百万美元。

big
NYSE:CRS Debt to Equity History July 11th 2024
纽交所:CRS股权负债历史回顾 2024年7月11日

How Healthy Is Carpenter Technology's Balance Sheet?

卡朋特科技的资产负债表健康状况怎么样?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Carpenter Technology had liabilities of US$453.4m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.22b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$53.5m and US$521.2m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.10b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我们可以从最近的资产负债表上看到,卡朋特科技有4,534百万美元的短期负债和12.2亿美元的长期负债到期。 另一方面,它有5,350万美元的现金和5,212百万美元的应收账款到一年内到期。 因此,它的负债比现金和短期应收账款总和多11亿美元。

Carpenter Technology has a market capitalization of US$5.32b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

卡朋特科技的市值为53.2亿美元,因此,如果需要,它很可能筹集资金以改善其资产负债表。 但很明显,我们应该密切关注它是否可以管理其债务而不进行稀释。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

Carpenter Technology has net debt worth 1.6 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 5.4 times the interest expense. While that doesn't worry us too much, it does suggest the interest payments are somewhat of a burden. Pleasingly, Carpenter Technology is growing its EBIT faster than former Australian PM Bob Hawke downs a yard glass, boasting a 216% gain in the last twelve months. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Carpenter Technology can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

卡朋特科技的净负债为EBITDA的1.6倍,这并不算太高,但是它的利息覆盖率看起来有点低,因为EBIT仅为利息支出的5.4倍。 虽然这并不太让人担忧,但它确实表明利息支付有些负担。 令人高兴的是,卡朋特科技的EBIT增长速度比澳大利亚前总理鲍勃·霍克喝啤酒还快,过去十二个月增长了216%。 在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是明显的起点。 但最终,业务未来的盈利能力将决定卡朋特科技能否随时间加强其资产负债表。 因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看此免费报告,其中显示了分析师的利润预测。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last two years, Carpenter Technology reported free cash flow worth 12% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.

最后,虽然国税局可能喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受冰冷的现金。 因此,我们需要清楚地看到,这份利润是否导致相应的自由现金流。 在过去的两年中,卡朋特科技报告的自由现金流只相当于其EBIT的12%,这实在是相当低的。 对于我们来说,这么低的现金转换率对其熄灭债务的能力引发了一些担忧。

Our View

我们的观点

On our analysis Carpenter Technology's EBIT growth rate should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to convert EBIT to free cash flow. Considering this range of data points, we think Carpenter Technology is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Carpenter Technology .

根据我们的分析,卡朋特科技的EBIT增长率表明,它不会太担心其债务。 然而,我们的其他观察并没有那么令人振奋。 例如,看起来它必须努力将EBIT转换为自由现金流。 考虑到这些数据点,我们认为卡朋特科技在管理其债务水平方面处于良好位置。 但是,需要注意的是:我们认为债务水平足以证明需要持续监测。 明显,资产负债表是分析债务的关键领域。 但最终,每家公司都可能存在超出资产负债表之外的风险。 为此,您应该了解我们在卡朋特科技方面发现的四个警告信号。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

说到底,有时更容易关注那些甚至不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费查看零净债务增长股票列表,立即获得。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发