share_log

Walmart Inc.'s (NYSE:WMT) Market Cap Touched US$562b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

Walmart Inc.'s (NYSE:WMT) Market Cap Touched US$562b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

沃尔玛公司(纽交所:WMT)上周市值达到5620亿美元,45%持股私营公司和机构均受益。
Simply Wall St ·  13:32

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Walmart indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 沃尔玛的私营公司拥有相当大的控股权,表明它们集体在管理和业务策略方面有更大的发言权
  • 一共有3个投资者持有该公司的绝大多数股份,占有50%的股权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

为了了解沃尔玛公司(纽交所:WMT)真正的控制者,了解业务的所有权结构是很重要的。我们可以看到,私人公司拥有公司的大部分控股权,占45%。换句话说,该集团有可能获得(或失去)他们投资公司的最多的收益。

Following a 3.2% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but institutions who own 35% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上周股价上涨3.2%,私人公司最为受益,35%的股票由机构持有者拥有,他们也从涨价中获利。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Walmart, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解沃尔玛的每一种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:WMT Ownership Breakdown July 11th 2024
纽交所:WMt所有权分布2024年7月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Walmart?

机构投资者在沃尔玛中拥有相当数量的股份,这意味着在专业投资者中具有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,这类情况常常出现大幅度股价下跌。因此,检查沃尔玛公司过去的盈利轨迹(如下)是值得的。当然,还要记住考虑其他因素。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Walmart. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Walmart, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

纽交所:WMt收入和营收增长2024年7月11日,沃尔玛不是由对冲基金拥有的。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是沃尔顿企业有限责任公司,拥有37%的流通股份。第二大股东持有约7.9%的流通股份,第三大股东持有5.1%的权益。

big
NYSE:WMT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 11th 2024
沃尔玛的管理层内部持股情况表明他们拥有公司不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过我们未发现的企业架构间接拥有权益。作为一个如此巨大的公司,我们不希望管理层内部持有大量股票。总的来说,他们共计拥有50亿美元的股票。最近的买卖行为同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买卖股票。

Walmart is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Walton Enterprises, LLC with 37% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

持股19%的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,在沃尔玛公司拥有一定的影响力。尽管这种所有权比例可能不足以使政策决策偏向于他们,但他们仍然可以对公司的政策产生集体影响。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Walmart

思考公司所有股份的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地了解沃尔玛,我们需要考虑许多其他因素,例如公司的风险。沃尔玛存在2个警告信号,我们认为你应该意识到。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Walmart Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$5.0b of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息显示,沃尔玛公司的内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过我们未发现的企业架构间接拥有权益。作为一个如此巨大的公司,我们不希望管理层内部持有大量股票。总的来说,他们共计拥有50亿美元的股票。最近的买卖行为同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买卖股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Walmart. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众拥有19%的股权,主要由个人投资者组成,在沃尔玛公司有一定的说服力。虽然这种所有权比例可能不足以使政策决策偏向于他们,但他们仍然可以对公司的政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 45%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

思考拥有公司股份的不同机构总是值得的。但要更好地了解华峰化学有限公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如:我们已经发现华峰化学有限公司的1个警示信号,你需要了解。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Walmart better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Walmart has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

思考公司所有股份的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地了解沃尔玛,我们需要考虑许多其他因素,例如公司的风险。沃尔玛存在2个警告信号,我们认为你应该意识到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发