share_log

Private Companies in China Tourism Group Duty Free Corporation Limited (SHSE:601888) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 4.0% Last Week

Private Companies in China Tourism Group Duty Free Corporation Limited (SHSE:601888) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 4.0% Last Week

中国中免私营企业是该公司最大的投资者,他们的投注得到了回报,该股上周涨了4.0%
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 18:59

Key Insights

主要见解

  • China Tourism Group Duty Free's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • China Tourism Group Corporation Limited owns 50% of the company
  • 17% of China Tourism Group Duty Free is held by Institutions
  • 中国中免重要的私人公司所有权表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响。
  • 中国旅游集团有限公司拥有该公司50%的股份。
  • 机构持有中国中免17%的股份。

If you want to know who really controls China Tourism Group Duty Free Corporation Limited (SHSE:601888), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制中国中免(SHSE:601888),那么你就必须看看它的股份登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,由私人公司拥有该公司50%的所有权。换句话说,该集团在其对公司的投资中将获得最多(或损失最多)的收益。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥137b market cap following a 4.0% gain in the stock.

因此,在该公司股票上涨4.0%后,私人公司在上周共获得了CN¥1370亿市值的最高分。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Tourism Group Duty Free.

在下面的图表中,我们可以看到中国中免的不同所有权团体。

big
SHSE:601888 Ownership Breakdown July 11th 2024
SHSE:601888所有权拆分2024年7月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Tourism Group Duty Free?

机构持股告诉我们关于中国中免的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that China Tourism Group Duty Free does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at China Tourism Group Duty Free's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到中国中免确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者方面有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像每个人一样。如果多个机构同时改变他们对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得注意的是,下面介绍了中国中免的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
SHSE:601888 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 11th 2024
SHSE:601888收入及收益增长2024年7月11日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in China Tourism Group Duty Free. China Tourism Group Corporation Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 2.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

对于中国中免,对冲基金没有持有太多股票。中国旅游集团有限公司是目前公司最大的股东,拥有50%的流通股份。这基本上意味着他们对公司的未来具有广泛的影响力,如果不是直接控制。为了提供上下文,第二大股东持有流通股的约2.8%,第三大股东的持股比例为1.9%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of China Tourism Group Duty Free

中国中免内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们的数据无法确认董事会成员是否持有个人股份。董事会成员至少持有一些个人股份是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行动是检查CEO的薪资。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in China Tourism Group Duty Free. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是个人投资者的公众持有中国中免的33%股份。虽然该集团不能直接决定,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 50%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据显示私营公司持有该公司50%的股份。仅从这个事实中很难得出任何结论,因此它值得探究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时候,内部人员或其他相关方利用独立的私营公司在公开公司中持有股份的利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for China Tourism Group Duty Free that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同集团真的很值得,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了中国中免的1个警告信号,你应该意识到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发