share_log

Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Boustead Singapore's (SGX:F9D) Earnings Are

Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Boustead Singapore's (SGX:F9D) Earnings Are

法定利润并不能反映宝德新加坡(新加坡交易所:F9D)的盈利状况有多好
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 19:33

Even though Boustead Singapore Limited's (SGX:F9D) recent earnings release was robust, the market didn't seem to notice. Investors are probably missing some underlying factors which are encouraging for the future of the company.

尽管宝德新加坡有限公司(SGX:F9D)最近的业绩表现良好,但市场似乎并未注意到。投资者可能忽略了一些对公司未来有利的潜在因素。

big
SGX:F9D Earnings and Revenue History July 11th 2024
SGX:F9D的收益和营业收入历史记录2024年7月11日。

Examining Cashflow Against Boustead Singapore's Earnings

针对宝德新加坡的现金流与收益的分析。

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高级金融领域,衡量公司将报告的利润转化为自由现金流(FCF)的关键比率是应计比率(从现金流量中)。简而言之,此比率将FCF从净利润中扣除,然后将该数字除以该期间内公司的平均营运资产。这个比率告诉我们公司利润中有多少不由自由现金流支持。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.

因此,负应计比率对公司有益,而正应计比率则不利。 尽管应计比率高于零并无大碍,但我们认为当公司的应计比率相对较高时,值得注意。这是因为一些学术研究表明,高应计比率往往会导致利润率降低或利润增长减缓。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, Boustead Singapore recorded an accrual ratio of -0.14. Therefore, its statutory earnings were quite a lot less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of S$91m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of S$64.2m. Boustead Singapore shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months.

在截至2024年3月的十二个月中,宝德新加坡的应计比率为-0.14。因此,其法定收益相当少,不及其自由现金流。实际上,它在过去一年中有9100万新加坡元的自由现金流,远高于其6420万新加坡元的法定利润。宝德新加坡的股东们无疑对过去十二个月的自由现金流的提高感到高兴。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Boustead Singapore.

注:我们始终建议投资者检查资产负债表的强度。单击此处,进入我们对宝德新加坡资产负债表分析的页面。

Our Take On Boustead Singapore's Profit Performance

我们对宝德新加坡的利润表现的看法。

Boustead Singapore's accrual ratio is solid, and indicates strong free cash flow, as we discussed, above. Based on this observation, we consider it likely that Boustead Singapore's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And on top of that, its earnings per share increased by 42% in the last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Boustead Singapore.

宝德新加坡的应计比率很好,表明其有强大的自由现金流,正如我们上面所讨论的。根据这一观察,我们认为宝德新加坡的法定利润实际上低估了其盈利潜力!此外,其每股收益在过去一年增长了42%。本文的目标在于评估我们能否依靠法定收益来反映公司的潜力,但仍有许多要考虑的因素。因此,如果您想深入了解这支股票,重要的是考虑它面临的任何风险。例如,我们已发现1个警告信号,您应该对宝德新加坡进行更全面的了解。

Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Boustead Singapore's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

今天,我们聚焦于一项单一数据点,以更好地了解宝德新加坡的盈利性质。但如果您能专注于细节,仍然有更多可发现的内容。有些人认为高股本回报率是高质量企业的良好迹象。因此,您可能希望查看这个免费的高股本回报率公司收藏,或者查看这个拥有高内部持股的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发