share_log

Jardine Cycle & Carriage (SGX:C07) Shareholders Have Endured a 9.5% Loss From Investing in the Stock Five Years Ago

Jardine Cycle & Carriage (SGX:C07) Shareholders Have Endured a 9.5% Loss From Investing in the Stock Five Years Ago

Jardine Cycle & Carriage(新加坡交易所:C07)股东在五年前投资该股票后已经蒙受了9.5%的损失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 21:31

Ideally, your overall portfolio should beat the market average. But the main game is to find enough winners to more than offset the losers At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited (SGX:C07), since the last five years saw the share price fall 27%. We also note that the stock has performed poorly over the last year, with the share price down 24%.

理想情况下,您的整个投资组合应该跑赢市场平均水平。但是,主要还是要找到足够的赢家来抵消输家的影响。此时,一些股东可能会对新加坡交易所股份有限公司 (SGX:C07) 的投资产生疑问,因为过去五年的股价下跌了27%。我们也注意到,该股票在过去一年表现不佳,股价下跌了24%。

It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.

值得评估公司的经济状况是否与这些不尽如人意的股东回报同时发展并步调一致,或者两者之间是否存在差异。因此,让我们来看看。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

虽然一些人仍然在教授高效市场假说,但已经证明市场是过度反应的动态系统,投资者不总是理性的。一种有缺陷但合理的评估公司情绪变化的方法是比较每股收益 (EPS) 与股价。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Jardine Cycle & Carriage actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 24% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在股价滑落的不幸的五年期间,新加坡交易所股份有限公司的每股收益 (EPS) 实际上每年提高了24%。因此,EPS似乎不是了解市场如何评估股票的好指南。另外,过去的增长预期可能不合理。

Because of the sharp contrast between the EPS growth rate and the share price growth, we're inclined to look to other metrics to understand the changing market sentiment around the stock.

由于EPS增长率与股价增长率之间的明显对比,我们倾向于寻找其他指标以了解股票周围变化的市场情绪。

We note that the dividend has remained healthy, so that wouldn't really explain the share price drop. While it's not completely obvious why the share price is down, a closer look at the company's history might help explain it.

我们注意到分红派息仍然健康,因此这并不能真正解释股价下跌。虽然股价下跌的原因不完全明显,但更仔细地查看公司历史记录可能有助于解释。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

以下图像显示了公司的营业收入和盈利(随时间变化)(单击以查看准确的数字)。

big
SGX:C07 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 12th 2024
SGX:C07于2024年7月12日的收益和营业收入增长

It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

很高兴看到在过去三个月中有一些重要的内部买入。这是一个积极因素。即便如此,我们认为盈利和营收的增长趋势更重要。因此,我们推荐查看这份显示共识预测的免费报告。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Jardine Cycle & Carriage, it has a TSR of -9.5% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

当考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑总股东回报率 (TSR) 和股价回报率之间的差异。TSR是一项回报计算,考虑了现金股息的价值(假设获得的任何股息都是再投资的)以及任何折扣后的融资和分拆的计算价值。因此,对于那些支付丰厚股息的公司,TSR经常比股价回报率高得多。对于新加坡交易所股份有限公司而言,过去五年的TSR为-9.5%。这超过了我们之前提到的股价回报率。这很大程度上是其分红支付的结果!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

While the broader market gained around 8.1% in the last year, Jardine Cycle & Carriage shareholders lost 20% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 1.8% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Jardine Cycle & Carriage (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

尽管包括股息在内,Jardine Cycle & Carriage的股东在过去一年中损失了20%,而整个市场在同一时期上涨了约8.1%。即使好股票的股价有时会下跌,但我们希望在对一个业务进行过度投资前,能够看到其基本指标的改善。不幸的是,去年的表现可能表明存在着未解决的挑战,因为其表现比过去五年中的年化损失1.8%还要差。一般来说,长期股价下跌可能是一个不好的迹象,不过逆市投资者可能希望研究该股,以期逆势而上。我发现以股价长期为代表来代表业务表现非常有趣。但是,为了获得真正的洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已发现关于Jardine Cycle & Carriage的2项警告标志(其中1项相当重要!),您在此投资之前应该注意。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar).

如果您喜欢与管理层共同购买股票,那么您可能会喜欢这个免费的公司列表(提示:大多数公司没有受到关注)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges.

请注意,本文中引用的市场回报反映了当前在新加坡交易所上市股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发