share_log

Private Companies in Concord Healthcare Group Co., Ltd. (HKG:2453) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 17% Last Week

Private Companies in Concord Healthcare Group Co., Ltd. (HKG:2453) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 17% Last Week

康和医疗集团股份有限公司的私营公司是最大的投注者,他们的赌注得到了回报,上周股价上涨了17%
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 03:23

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Concord Healthcare Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 59% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 私人公司对康和医疗集团的重要控制意味着公众在管理和治理相关决策方面有更大的影响力。
  • 前三大股东持有该企业的59%。
  • 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Concord Healthcare Group Co., Ltd. (HKG:2453), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解康和医疗集团有谁真正掌控,了解公司的所有权结构就变得非常重要。其中持股最多的是持有44%股权的私人公司群体。换句话说,该群体最有可能从他们对这家公司的投资中获得最多(或失去最多)的利益。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 17% gain.

因此,私人公司是上周17%股价涨幅最大的受益者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Concord Healthcare Group.

下面的图表展示了康和医疗集团的不同持股群体。

big
SEHK:2453 Ownership Breakdown July 12th 2024
SEHK:2453所有权结构2024年7月12日分布情况

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Concord Healthcare Group?

康和医疗集团缺乏机构的持股,对我们意味着什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Concord Healthcare Group's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司可能没有机构在股东名册中的原因有很多。如果流动性(每日交易的股数)低,机构可能很难买到大量股票。如果公司没有需要筹集资金,机构可能没有建立头寸的机会。或者,专业投资者可能避开某个公司,因为他们不认为这是最好的投资去处。康和医疗集团的盈利和营业收入记录(如下图所示)可能没有说服机构投资者,或者他们可能没有仔细审查这家公司的业务。

big
SEHK:2453 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 12th 2024
SEHK:2453盈利和营业收入增长情况2024年7月12日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Concord Healthcare Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Hongshan Capital Investment Management (Tianjin) Limited with 27% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 17% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 15% by the third-largest shareholder.

对于康和医疗集团,对冲基金持股不多。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是持有27%流通股的宏山资本投资管理(天津)有限公司。为了更好地理解,持有第二大流通股的股东持股约为17%,第三大股东持股为15%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 59% stake.

股东登记表的更详细研究告诉我们,前三大股东拥有该公司的59%股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但同时调查分析师建议也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们目前没有发现任何关于该公司的分析师报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Concord Healthcare Group

康和医疗集团内部股东的持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,在管辖范围之间会有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理担任执行董事会成员并非不寻常,特别是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Concord Healthcare Group Co., Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth HK$2.8b. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有康和医疗集团股票。内部人士持有价值28亿港元的有意义的股份。对于内部人士进行投资是好事。您可以在此处查看内部人士最近是否有买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Concord Healthcare Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

占有11%的股份,一般大众,主要由个人投资者组成,可以在康和医疗集团中发挥一定的影响力。虽然这种持股比例可能不足以在政策决策方面产生影响,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With a stake of 17%, private equity firms could influence the Concord Healthcare Group board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

持有17%的私人股权投资公司可能会对康和医疗集团的董事会产生影响。有些人可能会喜欢这一点,因为私募股权投资有时会将管理层视为和持方的责任主体。但另一方面,私募股权有时会出售持有的股份,即将公司上市。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到私人公司持有已发行股票的44%。这可能值得更深入地研究。如果相关的方,如内部人士,在这些私人公司之一拥有利益,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 19% of the Concord Healthcare Group shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我们可以看到公共公司持有康和医疗集团发行的股票的19%。这可能是一个战略利益,这两个公司可能有相关的业务利益。他们可能已经进行了分离。这个持股可能值得深入调查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Concord Healthcare Group you should know about.

尽管考虑拥有一家公司的不同机构是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现康和医疗集团有一个警告标志,您应该知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更愿意查看另一家具有潜在更强财务状况的公司,请不要错过这份由强大财务数据支撑的有趣公司的免费列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发