share_log

Here's Why Danaher (NYSE:DHR) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Danaher (NYSE:DHR) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

为什么丹纳赫(纽交所:DHR)能够负责地管理其债务
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 09:00

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies Danaher Corporation (NYSE:DHR) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦巴菲特曾经说过,“波动性远非风险代名词”。因此我们认为,债务——通常和破产有关——是评估公司风险时非常重要的因素。同许多其他公司一样,丹纳赫公司(纽交所:DHR)也利用债务。但真正的问题是,是否这些债务会使该公司变得更加冒险。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什么时候负债才是一个问题?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

债务是帮助企业成长的工具,但如果企业无力偿还债务,则意味着企业处于债权人的掌控之下。最糟糕的情况是,如果企业无法偿还债务,则可能会破产。然而,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东的权益,才能控制债务。但是,通过债务替代权益稀释,债务可以成为那些需要资本以高回报率进行投资的企业的极好工具。在评估债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平的结合。

What Is Danaher's Debt?

丹纳赫的债务情况?

As you can see below, Danaher had US$18.2b of debt at March 2024, down from US$19.8b a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$7.03b in cash leading to net debt of about US$11.1b.

如下图所示,截至2024年3月,丹纳赫的债务总额为182亿美元,较上年的198亿美元有下降。反观其现金流,其有70.3亿美元的现金,因此净债务约为111亿美元。

big
NYSE:DHR Debt to Equity History July 12th 2024
纽交所:DHR的债务-股本历史变化

A Look At Danaher's Liabilities

看一下丹纳赫的负债情况?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Danaher had liabilities of US$7.78b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$22.2b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$7.03b and US$3.38b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$19.5b.

从最新的资产负债表数据来看,我们可以发现丹纳赫的1年内到期负债金额为77.8亿美元,超过1年到期的负债总额为222亿美元。另一方面,其有70.3亿美元的现金以及33.8亿美元的1年内到期应收票据。因此,其负债总额超过了其现金流和(短期)应收账款的总和,达到了195亿美元。

Of course, Danaher has a titanic market capitalization of US$179.4b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

当然,丹纳赫具有1794亿美元的巨额市值,因此这些负债可能是可管理的。但依旧有足够的负债数额,我们一定会建议股东们继续关注公司的资产负债表状况。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通过查看公司的净债务与利息、税、折旧、摊销前利润(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息费用(利息覆盖率)可以衡量一个公司的债务负担与收益能力。因此,我们考虑将债务与有无计算折旧和摊销费用的收益相对比。

Danaher's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 1.5 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 1k times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. In fact Danaher's saving grace is its low debt levels, because its EBIT has tanked 25% in the last twelve months. When a company sees its earnings tank, it can sometimes find its relationships with its lenders turn sour. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Danaher can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

丹纳赫的净债务/息税折旧及摊销前利润(EBITDA)比率约为1.5,表明公司在债务方面的使用只属于中等程度。其0.1万倍于利息费用的EBIT显著,表明债务负载轻如孔雀羽毛。实际上,丹纳赫保存了低水平的债务,因为其EBIT在过去12个月中下跌了25%。当公司看到其盈利下滑时,有时会发现其与贷款人的关系变得糟糕。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但最终商业的未来盈利能力将决定丹纳赫是否能随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的想法,您可能会发现下面这篇关于分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Danaher recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 98% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

但我们的考虑也非常重要,因为公司无法用纸面盈利支付债务;它需要强有力的现金流。因此我们总是会检查公司利润贡献转化成的自由现金流金额。在过去的三年中,丹纳赫记录了价值98%的EBIT的自由现金流,这比我们通常预计的要强。这使其有能力在需要时偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

The good news is that Danaher's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. But we must concede we find its EBIT growth rate has the opposite effect. All these things considered, it appears that Danaher can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Danaher , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

好消息是,丹纳赫已经证明其能够用EBIT覆盖其利息支出,这让我们感到像毛绒绒的小狗一样高兴。但是我们必须承认,我们发现其EBIT增长率具有相反的效应。考虑到所有这些因素,丹纳赫似乎可以轻松处理其当前的债务水平。好处是,这种杠杆可以提高股东回报,但潜在的下降风险也更高,因此值得关注公司的资产负债表。资产负债表很明显是分析债务的一个关键区域。但最终,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。我们已经发现了与丹纳赫相关的警告信号,而了解它们应该是您的投资过程的一部分。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发