share_log

Textron (NYSE:TXT) Has More To Do To Multiply In Value Going Forward

Textron (NYSE:TXT) Has More To Do To Multiply In Value Going Forward

德事隆公司(纽交所:TXT)未来还有更多增值空间。
Simply Wall St ·  13:58

What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? In a perfect world, we'd like to see a company investing more capital into its business and ideally the returns earned from that capital are also increasing. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after investigating Textron (NYSE:TXT), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.

要想找到一个长期能够翻倍的股票,就必须遵循以下所有规则:在完美世界里,我们希望看到一个公司投资更多的资本到业务,理想情况下,从该资本获得的回报也在增长。基本上,这意味着一家公司有利可图的创举,可以继续投资,这是一个复利机器的特点。然而,经过对德事隆(NYSE:TXT)的调查,我们认为它目前的趋势不符合一个股票多倍增长的模式。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Textron is:

对于那些不确定ROCE是什么的人,它衡量的是一家公司从其业务中使用的资本创造的税前利润的数量。在德事隆(Textron)的计算公式中:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。

0.11 = US$1.3b ÷ (US$16b - US$4.4b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

0.11=1300000000美元÷(160亿美元- 44亿美元)(根据截至2024年3月的近十二个月计算)

Thus, Textron has an ROCE of 11%. In absolute terms, that's a pretty normal return, and it's somewhat close to the Aerospace & Defense industry average of 9.6%.

因此,德事隆的ROCE为11%。绝对的来看,这是一个相当正常的回报,并且与航空航天和国防行业平均水平9.6%相差不大。

big
NYSE:TXT Return on Capital Employed July 12th 2024
纽交所:TXt资本雇用回报率为2024年7月12日

In the above chart we have measured Textron's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Textron .

在上图中,我们已经比较了德事隆的先前ROCE与其先前业绩,但未来可能更为重要。如果您想了解分析师们预测的未来走势,请查看我们的免费分析师报告,了解德事隆的详细信息。

How Are Returns Trending?

综合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其资本利用率所产生的回报。考虑到股票过去五年保持稳定,如果其他指标也不错,则可能存在机会。因此,进一步研究这家公司并确定这些趋势是否会持续是合理的。

Over the past five years, Textron's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Textron in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.

在过去的五年中,德事隆的ROCE和资本雇用率一直保持稳定。当看到一个成熟和稳定的企业不再将其利润再次投资时,这种情况并不罕见,因为它可能已经通过了商业周期的这个阶段。因此,除非我们看到德事隆在ROCE方面发生重大变化并进行额外的投资,否则不会奢望德事隆成为多倍增长的股票。

The Bottom Line

还有一件事需要注意的是,我们已经确定了上海医药的2个警告信号,了解这些信号应该成为你的投资过程的一部分。

In a nutshell, Textron has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. Although the market must be expecting these trends to improve because the stock has gained 82% over the last five years. But if the trajectory of these underlying trends continue, we think the likelihood of it being a multi-bagger from here isn't high.

简而言之,德事隆在过去五年中一直保持着相同数量的资本相同的收益率。尽管市场可能希望这些趋势会改善,因为股票在过去的五年中增长了82%。但如果这些基本趋势的轨迹继续,我们认为其成为多倍增长的可能性不高。

One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with Textron and understanding this should be part of your investment process.

还有一件事需要注意的是,我们已经确认了一项关于德事隆的警告信号,而理解这一点应该成为投资过程的一部分。

While Textron may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

虽然德事隆目前可能没有获得最高的回报,但我们已经编制了一份当前获得25%以上股本回报率的公司清单。请在此处查看免费名单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发