share_log

AZZ Inc.'s (NYSE:AZZ) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.9% Over Last Week

AZZ Inc.'s (NYSE:AZZ) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.9% Over Last Week

azz inc(纽交所:AZZ)的高机构持股率说明它的股票仍然表现出色,上周涨了5.9%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 15:09

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, AZZ's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 机构拥有该股大量的股份,因此AZZ的股价可能受其交易决策的影响。
  • 总共有9个投资者拥有该公司52%的所有权。
  • 内部人员最近一直在买入。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of AZZ Inc. (NYSE:AZZ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

为了了解AZZ Inc.(NYSE:AZZ)真正掌控权在谁手中,了解公司的所有权结构至关重要。机构享有公司的最大股份—78%的股份。换句话说,机构面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Last week's 5.9% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 90% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上周股价上涨了5.9%,意味着尽管公司长期趋势强劲,机构投资者也处于正面的态势中。目前的投资回报率为90%,而上周的涨幅将会高兴地接受。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AZZ.

让我们仔细研究一下股东的不同类型,看看它们能为我们揭示关于AZZ的什么信息。

big
NYSE:AZZ Ownership Breakdown July 12th 2024
NYSE:AZZ所有权分布图2024年7月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AZZ?

机构投资持股告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AZZ. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see AZZ's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所见,机构投资者在AZZ中有相当大的股份,这表明专业投资者认可AZZ。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构投资者有时会做出错误的投资决策,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,始终存在他们进行“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方面可能会竞相快速抛售股票。这种风险在没有历史增长的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到AZZ的历史收益和营业收入情况,但请记住,事情肯定不止于此。

big
NYSE:AZZ Earnings and Revenue Growth July 12th 2024
NYSE:AZZ收益和营业收入增长图2024年7月12日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in AZZ. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.6% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Thomas Ferguson, the CEO has 0.8% of the shares allocated to their name.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此可能在董事会决策上有很强的影响力。对冲基金在AZZ中没有太多股份。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有13%的流通股。为了有更好的了解,第二大股东持有大约9.2%的流通股,第三大股东持有8.6%的流通股。此外,我们发现,CEO Thomas Ferguson名下分配了0.8%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的研究,发现前9位股东持有的股份约占登记表的52%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

尽管有道理去研究一家公司的机构所有权数据,但了解分析师的观点也很有道理,以便知道市场的风向。由于相当多的分析师涵盖了该股票,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of AZZ

AZZ的内部拥有情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in AZZ Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$50m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人员确实拥有AZZ股份。内部人员持有价值5000万美元的实质股份。大多数人将会把这视为一个真正的积极因素。如果您想了解内部人员的利益相关问题,可以单击此处查看是否有内部人员正在购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in AZZ. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通投资者,通常指的是个人投资者,持有AZZ的20%的股份。虽然这个群体不能决定公司的走向,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AZZ better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - AZZ has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.

总是值得思考持有股票的不同群体。但要更好地了解AZZ,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如承受风险—AZZ存在3个警告标志(其中1个值得关注),我们认为您应该知道这些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发