share_log

Institutional Investors Control 83% of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NYSE:VRTS) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 4.3%

Institutional Investors Control 83% of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NYSE:VRTS) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 4.3%

机构投资者控制着绿地投资合伙公司83%的股份(NYSE:VRTS),上周股价上涨4.3%,他们得到了回报。
Simply Wall St ·  07/13 09:47

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Virtus Investment Partners' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 考虑到机构在该股上持有的大量股份,Virtus Investment Partners的股票价格可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
  • 共有8家投资者拥有该公司的50%所有权。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

Every investor in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (NYSE:VRTS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

纽交所(VRTS)所有投资者都应该了解最重要的股东群体。我们可以看到机构持有该公司的大部分股权,占83%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获益最大(或在经济衰退时损失最大)。

Last week's 4.3% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 16%.

上周的4.3%上涨意味着即使公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,机构投资者仍处于正面。上周的收益将进一步提高股东的一年回报率,目前为16%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Virtus Investment Partners.

在下面的图表中,我们着重关注Virtus Investment Partners的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:VRTS Ownership Breakdown July 13th 2024
NYSE:VRTS所有权结构于2024年7月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Virtus Investment Partners?

机构投资者的持股情况能告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Virtus Investment Partners. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Virtus Investment Partners' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Virtus Investment Partners中拥有相当比例的股份。这意味着一些专业投资者认为该公司有些可信度。但我们不能仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时会像其他人一样犯糊涂的投资。如果多个机构同时改变他们的股票看法,你可能会看到股票价格快速下跌。所以,值得看一下下面的Virtus Investment Partners的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:VRTS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 13th 2024
NYSE:VRTS盈利和营收增长于2024年7月13日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Virtus Investment Partners is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO George Aylward directly holds 3.7% of the total shares outstanding.

投资者应该注意到机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上,因此他们可以集体行使重要的权利。Virtus Investment Partners不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股东,持有15%的流通股。为了更好理解,第二大股东持有约13%的流通股,第三大股东拥有4.5%的所有权。此外,该公司的首席执行官George Aylward直接持有总流通股的3.7%。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们对Brookfield Infrastructure有了更深入的了解,发现前8位股东占持股比例的约50%,这意味着除了大股东外还有少数小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Virtus Investment Partners

Virtus Investment Partners的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$99m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以报告,内部人确实拥有Virtus Investment Partners,Inc的股份。这是一家大公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是好的。内部人拥有价值9900万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到内部人这种程度的投资是好的。您可以在此处检查内幕人员最近是否在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众——包括零售投资者——在公司中拥有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。虽然持股规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Virtus Investment Partners is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我发现查看公司的所有权非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,Virtus Investment Partners在我们的投资分析中显示出了1个警告信号,你应该知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发