share_log

Is Patrick Industries, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PATK) 14% ROE Strong Compared To Its Industry?

Is Patrick Industries, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PATK) 14% ROE Strong Compared To Its Industry?

Patrick Industries, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:PATK)的14%roe相对于行业板块而言较强吗?
Simply Wall St ·  07/13 10:38

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:PATK).

许多投资者仍在了解分析股票时有用的各种指标。本文是为了那些想学习“净资产收益率(ROE)”的人而写的。为使课程更具实用性,我们将利用ROE来更好地理解Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:PATK)。

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.

ROE(净资产收益率)是股东需考虑的一个重要因素,因为它告诉他们资本被有效地再投资的效果如何。换句话说,它揭示了公司将股东的投资转化为利润的成功程度。

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

怎样计算ROE?

The formula for return on equity is:

权益回报率的计算公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

净资产收益率 = 净利润(从持续经营中获得)÷ 股东权益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Patrick Industries is:

因此,根据上述公式,Patrick Industries的ROE为:

14% = US$148m ÷ US$1.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

14% = 1.48亿美元 ÷ 11亿美元(基于截至2024年3月的过去十二个月)。

The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.14 in profit.

所谓“回报率”是公司在过去一年中赚取的收入。这意味着,对于每1美元的股东权益,该公司创造了0.14美元的利润。

Does Patrick Industries Have A Good ROE?

Patrick Industries是否拥有良好的ROE?

Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. You can see in the graphic below that Patrick Industries has an ROE that is fairly close to the average for the Auto Components industry (12%).

可以说,评估公司ROE最简单的方法是将其与同行业的平均水平进行比较。这种方法的局限性在于,即使在同一行业分类中,有些公司也相当不同。如下图所示,可以看到Patrick Industries的ROE与汽车元件行业的平均水平(12%)相当接近。

big
NasdaqGS:PATK Return on Equity July 13th 2024
纳斯达克:PATk净资产收益率于2024年7月13日

So while the ROE is not exceptional, at least its acceptable. Even if the ROE is respectable when compared to the industry, its worth checking if the firm's ROE is being aided by high debt levels. If so, this increases its exposure to financial risk. To know the 2 risks we have identified for Patrick Industries visit our risks dashboard for free.

因此,尽管ROE并不是非常出色,但至少是可以接受的。即使与行业相比ROE可观,也值得检查公司ROE是否受到高额债务水平的支持。如果是这样,这将增加它面临的财务风险。为了了解我们已经针对Patrick Industries确定的两个风险,请免费访问我们的风险监控仪表板。

The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity

债务对股本回报率的重要性

Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

实际上,几乎所有公司都需要资金来投资业务、实现利润增长。这些资金可以来自发行股票、留存收益或债务。在前两种情况下,ROE将反映出资金在业务投资中的使用。在后一种情况下,用于增长所需的债务将提高回报率,但不会影响股东权益。因此,虽然债务的使用可以提高ROE,但在像比喻性的恶劣天气那样的情况下,也伴随着额外的风险。

Combining Patrick Industries' Debt And Its 14% Return On Equity

Patrick Industries的债务和14%的ROE的结合

Patrick Industries clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.32. While its ROE is respectable, it is worth keeping in mind that there is usually a limit as to how much debt a company can use. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.

Patrick Industries显然使用了大量债务来提高回报率,因为其负债对净值比为1.32。尽管其ROE可观,但重要的是要记住,公司可以使用的债务规模通常是有限的。投资者应仔细考虑公司在无法轻松借款的情况下可能表现如何,因为信贷市场随时间变化。

Conclusion

结论

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

ROE是我们可以比较不同公司业务质量的一种方式。没有负债可以实现高ROE的公司可以被认为是高质量的公司。如果两家公司的负债与股本约同,并且一家公司的ROE更高,则我通常更喜欢ROE更高的公司。

But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

但是roe只是更大难题中的一部分,因为高质量的企业通常以高市盈率交易。考虑到股票价格所反映的预期,利润增长率尤为重要。因此,您可能需要查看该公司分析师预测的免费可视化工具。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,您也可能通过寻找其他地方来找到出色的投资。因此,不妨查看这个有趣公司的免费列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发