share_log

Argan, Inc.'s (NYSE:AGX) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.3% Over the Past Week

Argan, Inc.'s (NYSE:AGX) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.3% Over the Past Week

作为Argan,Inc.的(NYSE:AGX)大型机构股东,股价在过去一周内持续上涨6.3%,一定会感到高兴。
Simply Wall St ·  07/13 10:44

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Argan implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构对Argan的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响。
  • 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Argan, Inc. (NYSE:AGX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解谁真正控制Argan,Inc.(NYSE: AGX),那么您必须看看其股权登记簿的构成。机构持有82%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体。换句话说,该机构将从其对该公司的投资中获得最多(或丢失最多)的利益。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$965m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 91%.

上周,机构投资者最终从公司市值达到9,650万美元中受益最多。上周的收益还将进一步提高股东的一年回报,目前为91%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Argan, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究Argan的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:AGX Ownership Breakdown July 13th 2024
NYSE: AGX所有权分裂2024年7月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Argan?

机构所有权告诉我们Argan的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Argan. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Argan, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所见,机构投资者在Argan中占有相当大的股份,表明专业投资者之间存在一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌也是常见的情况。因此,检查Argan的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)是值得的。当然,还要记住其他因素要考虑。

big
NYSE:AGX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 13th 2024
NYSE: AGX收益和营业收入增长2024年7月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Argan. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 10%. With 7.7% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, River Road Asset Management, LLC and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此可以在董事会决策上发挥强大的影响力。我们注意到对Argan的对冲基金投资不重要。该公司最大的股东是BlackRock, Inc.,拥有10%的所有权。River Road Asset Management,LLC和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分别拥有7.7%和5.8%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据的进一步研究表明,前13大股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Argan

Argan的内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can see that insiders own shares in Argan, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$965m, and insiders have US$53m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以看出公司内部人员持有Argan,Inc的股份。市值仅有9,650万美元,股东自有5,300万美元的股份。看到内部人员有一些投资是好事,但有必要检查是否有内部人员在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司中拥有12%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略他们。虽然这种所有权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Argan .

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该知道Argan的一个警告标志。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发