share_log

With a 41% Stake, Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company

With a 41% Stake, Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company

伊瑞保险公司(NASDAQ: ERIE)内部人持有41%的股份,对公司寄予厚望。
Simply Wall St ·  07/14 10:39

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Erie Indemnity implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • 33% of Erie Indemnity is held by Institutions
  • 内部人士对 Erie Indemnity 的重大控制意味着公司增长中的既得利益
  • 共有3名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有53%的所有权
  • 伊利赔偿金的33%由机构持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了伊利赔偿公司(纳斯达克股票代码:ERIE),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人内部人士,准确地说约为41%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

So, insiders of Erie Indemnity have a lot at stake and every decision they make on the company's future is important to them from a financial point of view.

因此,Erie Indemnity的内部人士面临很多风险,从财务角度来看,他们对公司未来做出的每一项决定对他们都很重要。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Erie Indemnity, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Erie Indemnity的每种类型的所有者。

big
NasdaqGS:ERIE Ownership Breakdown July 14th 2024
NASDAQGS:ERIE 所有权明细 2024 年 7 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Erie Indemnity?

关于伊利赔偿,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Erie Indemnity. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Erie Indemnity's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者在伊利赔偿中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Erie Indemnity的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:ERIE Earnings and Revenue Growth July 14th 2024
纳斯达克GS:ERIE收益和收入增长 2024年7月14日

Erie Indemnity is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Thomas Hagen, with ownership of 33%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

Erie Indemnity不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是托马斯·哈根,所有权为33%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约11%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有9.4%的所有权。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前三名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Erie Indemnity

Erie Indemnity 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Erie Indemnity Company. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$7.9b stake in this US$19b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

内部人士似乎拥有伊利赔偿公司的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项190亿美元的业务中拥有79亿美元的大量股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Erie Indemnity. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有16%的所有权的公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对伊利保险有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 11%, of the Erie Indemnity stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎拥有伊利赔偿公司11%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发