share_log

Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:603816) Stock Price Dropped 6.6% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:603816) Stock Price Dropped 6.6% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

顾家家居(杭州)有限公司(SHSE:603816)上周股价下跌6.6%;私营企业可能会感到不高兴。
Simply Wall St ·  20:20

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutions own 20% of Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd
  • 顾家家居(杭州)有限公司重要的私人公司所有权意味着其关键决策受到来自更广泛公众的股东的影响。
  • 总共有5位投资者拥有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 机构拥有顾家家居(杭州)有限公司20%的股权。

Every investor in Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:603816) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 41% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

顾家家居(杭州)股份有限公司(SHSE:603816)的每位投资者都应该注意最强大的股东团体。 持有最大份额的是拥有41%所有权的私人公司。 换句话说,该团体最可能从其对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。

As market cap fell to CN¥22b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着市值上周跌至220亿元人民币,私人公司将面临比该公司任何其他股东团体更大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东对顾家家居(杭州)有限公司有哪些告诉我们的地方。

big
SHSE:603816 Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
SHSE:603816所有权分布2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd?

机构持股如何告诉我们有关顾家家居(杭州)有限公司的信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,顾家家居(杭州)有限公司确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的很好一部分。 这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉度。 但是,我们不能仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会犯下糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,存在这样的风险,即它们处于“人满为患”的交易中。 当这样的交易出错时,多个方面可能会竞相快速抛售股票。 在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。 您可以在下面看到顾家家居(杭州)有限公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事永远不止于此。

big
SHSE:603816 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
SHSE:603816收益和营业收入增长2024年7月15日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd. Ningbo Yingfeng Ruihe Investment Management Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 30% of shares outstanding. With 9.1% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Kuka Group Company Limited and Jiang Sheng Gu are the second and third largest shareholders. Jiang Sheng Gu, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board. Furthermore, CEO Dong Lai Li is the owner of 1.7% of the company's shares.

我们注意到,对顾家家居(杭州)有限公司持有显著股权的是宁波英丰瑞禾投资管理有限公司,占流通股的30%。被流通股的9.1%和5.1%所占的分别是库卡集团有限公司和蒋胜古,排名第二和第三。翟胜古是第三大股东,也恰好担任董事会主席的职务。此外,首席执行官李东来是该公司股份的1.7%的持有人。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察后,我们发现前五大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中有很大的发言权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd

顾家家居(杭州)有限公司内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥1.7b worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人员持有顾家家居(杭州)股份有限公司的一些股票。 这是一个相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有意义的一致性是普遍的。 在这种情况下,他们拥有大约17亿元的股票(以当前价格计算)。 大多数人会说这显示股东和董事会之间的利益一致。 但是,值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通大众——包括零售投资者——拥有该公司的26%股份,因此不容易被忽视。虽然拥有规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东的决策不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With an ownership of 5.1%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

拥有5.1%的私募股权机构处于塑造以价值创造为重点的公司战略的位置。有时我们看到,私人股权会长期留存,但一般来说,它们的投资周期较短,而且正如其名称所示,不会在公共公司投资太多。一段时间后,他们可能会寻求出售并重新部署资本。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 41%, of the Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

似乎私人公司拥有顾家家居(杭州)有限公司股票的41%。私人公司可能是关联方。 有时,内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而不是作为个人拥有公共公司的股份对公共公司感兴趣。 虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是作为进一步研究的一个领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Jason Furniture (Hangzhou)Ltd (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

我发现看到谁拥有公司非常有趣。 但是为了获得真正的见解,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了顾家家居(杭州)有限公司的2个警告迹象(1个不应被忽视),您应该知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关注内容?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈? 对内容感到担忧? 请直接与我们联系。 或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发