share_log

Stryker (NYSE:SYK) Could Easily Take On More Debt

Stryker (NYSE:SYK) Could Easily Take On More Debt

Stryker(纽交所:SYK)可以轻松承担更多的债务
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 07:18

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Stryker Corporation (NYSE:SYK) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性和风险毫无关系。”当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过多会导致破产。我们可以看到,Stryker Corporation(纽交所:SYK)的业务中确实使用了债务。但真正的问题是,这些债务是否使该公司变得有风险。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务可以帮助企业,直到企业难以用新的资本或自由现金流偿还债务。如果企业无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能拿不到任何东西。然而,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司不得不以极低的价格发行股票,永久地稀释股东,仅仅为了支撑其资产负债表。当然,债务的好处在于,它往往代表着便宜的资本,特别是当债务取代具有高回报能力的公司股票时。当我们考虑一家公司的债务使用情况时,我们首先要看现金和债务。

What Is Stryker's Debt?

Stryker的债务状况如何?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Stryker had US$12.9b in debt in March 2024; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$2.41b, its net debt is less, at about US$10.5b.

下面的图表,您可以单击以获取更详细的信息,显示Stryker在2024年3月有129亿美元的债务,与前一年大致相同。但是,由于它拥有24.1亿美元的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为105亿美元。

big
NYSE:SYK Debt to Equity History July 15th 2024
纽交所:SYK的股票的债务股本比历史变化情况如下于2024年7月15日

How Strong Is Stryker's Balance Sheet?

Stryker的资产负债表有多强?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Stryker had liabilities of US$6.96b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$13.3b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$2.41b in cash and US$3.47b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$14.4b.

根据最近公布的资产负债表,Stryker拥有即将在12个月内到期的696亿美元的负债,以及超过12个月到期的1,330亿美元的负债。与此相抵消的是,它在12个月内拥有24.1亿美元的现金和34.7亿美元的应收账款。因此,它的负债比其现金和(近期)应收账款总和多了144亿美元。

Given Stryker has a humongous market capitalization of US$129.3b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考虑到Stryker的市值非常高达1293亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成很大的威胁。但是,很明显,我们应该继续监控其资产负债表,以防出现恶化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

Stryker's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 1.9 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 17.1 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. We note that Stryker grew its EBIT by 24% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Stryker's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Stryker的净债务/息税折旧前利润(EBITDA)比约为1.9,表明债务使用只是中度的。其约17.1倍的息税折旧前利润(EBIT)表明其债务负担如同孔雀的羽毛般轻盈。我们注意到,Stryker在过去一年中的EBIT增长了24%,这应该使其更容易还债。资产负债表显然是分析债务的重点领域。但最终,未在资产负债表之外存在的风险可能存在于任何公司中。请注意,Stryker在我们的投资分析中显示了2个警示信号,您应该知道......

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Stryker produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 65% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

但是,我们的最后考虑也很重要,因为公司无法用纸面利润偿还债务;它需要冰冷的现金。因此,检查那些可能使EBIT产生自由现金流的发展是值得的。在过去三年中,Stryker产生了强劲的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的65%,与我们的预期相当。这种实实在在的现金意味着它可以在希望时减轻债务。

Our View

我们的观点

The good news is that Stryker's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its EBIT growth rate is also very heartening. We would also note that Medical Equipment industry companies like Stryker commonly do use debt without problems. Zooming out, Stryker seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Stryker is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

好消息是,Stryker公司展示了用其EBIt支付利息的能力,就像小孩子拥抱毛茸茸的小狗一样让我们高兴。而且,这只是好消息的开始,因为它的EBIt增长率也非常令人欣慰。我们还应该注意到,像Stryker这样的医疗设备行业公司通常可以毫无问题地使用债务。从更宏观的角度来看,Stryker的债务使用非常合理;这得到了我们的认可。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提高股本回报率。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解了大多数有关债务的信息。但最终,每家公司都可能存在资产负债表之外的风险。请注意,我们的投资分析中Stryker显示出了2个警示信号,您应该了解一下......

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发