share_log

With 73% Ownership in Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 73% Ownership in Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

机构投资者在业务中占有Community Financial System,Inc.(纽交所:CBU)73%的所有权,风险重重。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 08:26

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Community Financial System's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 考虑到机构持有社区金融系统股份的比例较大,他们的交易决策可能会对该公司的股价构成风险。
  • 前8大股东持有公司50%的股份。
  • 最近有内部人员购买。

A look at the shareholders of Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看社区金融系统股份有限公司(纽交所:CBU)的股东可以帮助我们了解哪个群体最有实力。 持有公司股份最多的群体,约占公司股份的73%,是机构。 换言之,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 13% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 17% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

由于机构投资者的大股份,社区金融系统的股价在上周上涨13%后,他们获得了最多的回报。 目前,该公司的一年回报率为17%,上周的涨幅将会更加受欢迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Community Financial System.

让我们仔细观察社区金融系统不同类型的股东,以了解更多信息。

big
NYSE:CBU Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
纽交所CBU所有权分布格局:2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Community Financial System?

机构持股情况对社区金融系统有何影响?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Community Financial System does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Community Financial System's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到社区金融系统确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的大部分股票。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好不要过分依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错误。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总会存在他们参与的“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方面可能会竞相快速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以查看社区金融系统的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总有更多方面。

big
NYSE:CBU Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
社区金融系统的纽交所CBU盈利和营业收入增长情况:2024年7月15日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Community Financial System is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上股份,因此他们可以共同掌握相当大的权力。 社区金融系统不是由对冲基金持有的。 该公司的最大股东是黑石集团,拥有15%的股份。 为了更好的理解,第二大股东持有约12%的流通股,第三大股东持有7.0%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股情况是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以取得相同的结果。相当多的分析师涵盖了这笔股票,所以你可以很容易地调查预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Community Financial System

社区金融系统内部股权情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Community Financial System, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$34m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,社区金融系统股份有限公司的内部人员拥有一些股份。 这家公司很大,所以看到这种水平的一致性是好的。 内部人员拥有价值3400万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 看到内部人员的近期购买情况也是件好事。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,拥有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这样的所有权规模可能不足以在他们的利益中影响一项政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Community Financial System better, we need to consider many other factors.

思考公司股份所属不同群体始终是值得的。但为了更好地了解社区金融系统,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发