share_log

With 88% Ownership in Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 88% Ownership in Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在康明斯公司(纽交所:CMI)拥有88%的所有权,机构投资者在业务上有很多风险。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 08:34

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Cummins implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 机构对康明斯的大量持股意味着他们对该公司的股价有重大的影响。
  • 总共有19个投资者持有该公司大多数股份,占有51%的股权。
  • 内部人士最近购买了股票。

A look at the shareholders of Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 88% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

观察康明斯股份有限公司股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有力量。持有该公司股份最多的群体,准确来说是约占88%的机构股东。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$39b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 15%.

而上周机构投资者在康明斯市值达到390亿美元后获得了最多的利润。上周的收益进一步提高了股东的年度回报率,目前为15%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cummins, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究康明斯的每一种股东类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:CMI Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
NYSE:CMI所有权分解于2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cummins?

机构所有权对于康明斯有何启示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Cummins does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cummins, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们发现康明斯确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股份的一部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。然而,就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某支股票,股价大跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查一下康明斯的过去盈利轨迹(如下图)。当然,还有其他需要考虑的因素。

big
NYSE:CMI Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
NYSE:CMI营收和收入增长于2024年7月15日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cummins. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

投资者应该注意到,机构实际拥有该公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重大的权力。我们注意到,对康明斯拥有12%流通股的The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股东。作为背景,第二大股东持有约8.5%的流通股,第三大股东持有5.8%的流通股。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

进一步了解后,我们发现前19名股东在该公司中拥有51%的股权,这表明没有单一的股东能对该公司具有重大的控制力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Cummins

康明斯内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Cummins Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$169m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有的康明斯股份不到1%。作为一个如此之大的公司,我们不会期望内部人士拥有大量的股票。他们共持有1690万美元的股份。可以说,最近的买卖同样值得考虑。你可以点击此处查看内部人员是否在买卖股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众(包括零售投资者)持有该公司12%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略它们。虽然这个群体不能决定一切,但是肯定会对公司的运营产生影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Cummins is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

虽然考虑到拥有某家公司的不同群体非常值得,但有些因素甚至更为重要。请注意,Cummins在我们的投资分析中显示出了一个警告信号,您应该了解一下......

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发