share_log

CleanSpark, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLSK) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 53% Stake, While 44% Is Held by Institutions

CleanSpark, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLSK) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 53% Stake, While 44% Is Held by Institutions

CleanSpark,Inc.(纳斯达克:CLSK)的前53%持有者是散户投资者,机构持有44%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 10:30

Key Insights

主要见解

  • CleanSpark's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 37% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 44% of CleanSpark is held by Institutions
  • CleanSpark重要的零售投资者持股比例表明,主要决策受到更广泛公众的股东的影响。
  • 前25名股东持有37%的业务。
  • CleanSpark有44%的股份由机构持有。

Every investor in CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLSK) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 53% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

CleanSpark, Inc. (纳斯达克: CLSK)的每个投资者都应了解最强大的股东团体。持股比例最高的是零售投资者,占53%。换句话说,该团体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 44% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

而机构持股则占公司股东的44%。通常,机构会持有更成熟的公司的股票,而在较小的公司中,看到内部人持有相当多的股票是很平常的。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CleanSpark.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对CleanSpark的影响。

big
NasdaqCM:CLSK Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
纳斯达克CM:CLSk 2024年7月15日所有权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CleanSpark?

CleanSpark的机构持股告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

CleanSpark already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CleanSpark's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

CleanSpark的股份注册表上已经有机构了。事实上,他们在公司中拥有合理的股份。这表明了一些专业投资者的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时候会做出烂投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会快速下跌。因此,值得注意的是CleanSpark以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:CLSK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
纳斯达克CM:CLSk 2024年7月15日盈利和营业收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CleanSpark. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 6.6% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 3.1% of the stock. In addition, we found that Zachary Bradford, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

我们注意到对于CleanSpark而言,对冲基金没有有意义的投资。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是该公司的最大股东,持有6.6%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约5.5%和3.1%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官扎卡里·布拉德福德拥有1.3%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of CleanSpark

CleanSpark的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in CleanSpark, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$101m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明内部人员在CleanSpark,Inc.持有一些股份。内部人员拥有价值1,010万美元的有意义的股份。大多数人会认为这是真正的积极因素。大多数人会说这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益一致性。不过,检查一下那些内部人员是否一直在卖出股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 53% of CleanSpark shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,共持有CleanSpark的53%股份。这个所有权大小使得公众投资者具有一定的集体力量。他们可以并且可能会对执行薪酬、分红政策和拟议的业务收购做出影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CleanSpark better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that CleanSpark is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 3 of those make us uncomfortable...

思考公司股东分布总是值得的。但要更好地了解CleanSpark,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,我们的投资分析显示CleanSpark现在展示了4个警告信号,其中3个让我们不舒服……

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发