share_log

Following a 59% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:VIR) Institutional Owners

Following a 59% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:VIR) Institutional Owners

纳斯达克:Vir Biotechnology,Inc.(NASDAQ:VIR)的机构投资者近期获得收益,而去年则下跌59%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 11:46

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Vir Biotechnology implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 6 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构对Vir Biotechnology的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价具有重大影响力。
  • 公司前六大股东拥有该公司55%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:VIR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Vir Biotechnology, Inc.(纳斯达克:VIR)的股东,我们可以知道哪个群体最强大。机构拥有的股份占54%,在公司中占有最高的份额。换句话说,该群体将获得最多的收益(或损失最多),从他们对公司的投资中获益。

After a year of 59% losses, last week's 11% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

经历了59%的亏损一年后,上周的11%的涨幅可能会让机构投资者感到欣慰,可能意味着回报可能开始趋于上升。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vir Biotechnology.

让我们近距离观察一下Vir Biotechnology的不同类型的股东能告诉我们什么。

big
NasdaqGS:VIR Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
纳斯达克GS:VIR所有权分布于2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vir Biotechnology?

机构投资者拥有Vir Biotechnology相当多的股权。这表明专业投资者之间存在一定的可信度,但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出不良的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一个股票时,总会存在一种‘拥挤的交易’风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方派可能会竞相快速抛售股票。此风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。你可以看到Vir Biotechnology的历史收益和营业收入,但要记住故事的背后总存在更多的细节。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Vir Biotechnology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vir Biotechnology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

纳斯达克GS:VIR收益和营收增长于2024年7月15日。

big
NasdaqGS:VIR Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此他们可能能够强烈地影响董事会的决策。Vir Biotechnology不是由对冲基金拥有的。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是SoftBank投资顾问(英国)有限公司,持有12%的流通股。为了方便,第二大股东持有约12%的流通股,第三大股东持有9.5%的股份。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Vir Biotechnology is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is SoftBank Investment Advisers (UK) Limited with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

Vir Biotechnology的内部人员也持有公司的股份。这是一家大型公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是好的。内部人员拥有价值6500万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探究内部人员是否一致,请点击这里查看是否有内部人员进行了买卖。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 55% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们做了更多的调查,并发现前6名股东占登记簿的约55%,这意味着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Vir Biotechnology

私人股权投资公司持有Vir Biotechnology的22%股份。这意味着他们在重要的政策决策中可能是有影响力的。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓舞,因为私人股权有时能够鼓励市场看到公司的价值。另外,这些股东可能在上市后退出投资。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Vir Biotechnology, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$65m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人员确实持有Vir Biotechnology, Inc的股份。这是一家大型公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是好的。内部人员拥有6500万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想研究内部人员的一致性问题,可以点击此处查看内部人员是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众(包括散户投资者)拥有该公司的13%股份,因此不容忽视。虽然该群体不能决定,但肯定会对公司的运营产生实际影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 22% stake in Vir Biotechnology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股权投资公司持有Vir Biotechnology的22%股份。这意味着他们在重要的政策决策中可能是有影响力的。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓舞,因为私人股权有时能够鼓励市场看到公司的价值。另外,这些股东可能在上市后退出投资。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 6.3% of Vir Biotechnology. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我们认为,公共公司拥有Vir Biotechnology的6.3%。这可能是战略上的利益,这两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。它可能是他们已经分拆了。这个持股可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Vir Biotechnology (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

我发现准确了解一家公司到底由谁拥有是非常有趣的。但是为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经为Vir Biotechnology确定了3个警告信号(其中1个有点令人担忧),你应该注意这些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发