share_log

With 89% Institutional Ownership, KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 89% Institutional Ownership, KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

凭借89%的机构持股比例,KLA Corporation (纳斯达克:KLAC) 成为大型机构的最爱
Simply Wall St ·  14:23

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies KLA's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构持有份额较高,这意味着KLA的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 共有18家投资者拥有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 89% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解KLA Corporation (纳斯达克:KLAC)究竟由谁掌控,了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。这个公司所占比例最大的股东是持有89%股份的机构。换句话说,这个集团会从他们对公司的投资中获益最多(或者失去最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of KLA.

如下图所示,我们重点关注KLA的不同持股群体。

big
NasdaqGS:KLAC Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
纳斯达克:KLAC所有权分布情况,截至2024年7月15日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About KLA?

机构所有权告诉我们关于KLA的一些信息。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that KLA does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see KLA's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到KLA确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股份的很大一部分。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师们认为该股票值得关注,并且他们喜欢这个股票。但是和其他所有人一样,他们可能会犯错。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会有当它们处于“拥挤交易”中风险更高的情况。当这样的交易发生问题时,多个交易参与方可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看KLA的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住,还有更多未被揭示的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:KLAC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
纳斯达克:KLAC营收和收入增长情况,截至2024年7月15日。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in KLA. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.4% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.3% of the company stock.

投资者应该注意到,机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上,因此他们可以集体行使重要的权力。对于KLA,对冲基金持股并不多。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,拥有9.7%的流通股,第二大股东是拥有8.4%普通股的BlackRock,Inc.,而State Street Global Advisors,Inc.持有公司股票约4.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更详细地观察我们的所有权数据表明,前18位股东拥有51%的联合所有权,意味着没有单一的股东拥有大多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师建议是了解股票预期表现的更深入的做法。相当多的分析师都对该股票进行了研究,因此您可以轻松地查看预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of KLA

KLA的内部所有权。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of KLA Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$133m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明内部人员拥有KLA Corporation股份的比例不到1%。这是一家非常大的公司,因此公司内部人员拥有的比例很少。尽管他们的持股不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共持有超过1,330万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。在这种情况下,更有意思的是要看看这些内部人员是买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over KLA. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有10%的普通投资者,主要是个人投资者,对KLA具有一定的影响力。尽管持有股份很多,但如果该决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能无法改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for KLA that you should be aware of.

我发现查看公司实际上由谁拥有非常有趣。但是要真正获得见解,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了KLA的1个警告信号,您应该注意到。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发