share_log

UGI Corporation (NYSE:UGI) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 3.7% Loss Over the Past Year

UGI Corporation (NYSE:UGI) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 3.7% Loss Over the Past Year

纽交所UGI公司机构投资者也许对近年来3.7%的损失后最近的收益感到满意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 14:58

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies UGI's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 显著高的机构持股意味着UGI的股价对他们的交易行动非常敏感。
  • 共有13个投资者拥有该公司的大多数股份,持股比例为50%。
  • 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。

If you want to know who really controls UGI Corporation (NYSE:UGI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 84% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想了解UGI Corporation (纽交所:UGI)真正的控制者是谁,那么你将不得不看一下其股份登记簿的构成。有着84%的股份,机构拥有公司中的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该组织将获得最多的利益(或者如果出现下行将失去最多)。

Last week's US$249m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 3.7% losses.

上周美国24,900万市值增长可能会受到机构投资者的赞赏,尤其是在遭受3.7%损失之后的一年。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of UGI.

在下面的图表中,我们会放大UGI不同的所有权组。

big
NYSE:UGI Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
纽交所:UGI所有权分解2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UGI?

机构持股对于UGI意味着什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

UGI already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at UGI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

UGI已经有机构在股份登记簿上。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经查看了该股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,这只股票价格可能会快速下跌。因此值得看一下UGI以下的收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:UGI Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
纽交所:UGI的收益和营业收入增长2024年7月15日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in UGI. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

机构投资者拥有50%以上的公司股份,因此他们可以强烈影响董事会决策。我们注意到,对于UGI,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是黑石集团公司,拥有14%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的13%和4.9%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

通过查看股东登记表,我们可以看到前13大股东控制了50%的所有权,这意味着没有单个股东拥有多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。

Insider Ownership Of UGI

UGI的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of UGI Corporation in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$17m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据表明,持股人在自己的名字下持有的UGI Corporation持股不到1%。这是一家相当大的公司,所以董事会成员拥有公司的实际利益,而不必拥有很大比例的利益也是可能的。在这种情况下,他们拥有约1700万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部持股总是好的,但检查一下那些内部持股者是否已经出售也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over UGI. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

占据15%的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对于UGI有一定的影响力。尽管拥有这么多的所有权,如果决策不与其他大股东保持一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for UGI (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

虽然考虑到拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常有价值的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们在这里投资之前发现UGI有2个警告信号(1个不应忽视!)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发