share_log

Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company

Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company

默沙东公司(纽交所:MRK)受机构股东青睐,其持股比例达到公司总股份的78%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 15:34

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Merck's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 由于机构持有Merck的大股份,该公司的股价可能受到他们交易决策的影响。
  • 前25名股东拥有该公司的45%股份。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

If you want to know who really controls Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 78% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道谁真正控制着默沙东公司(NYSE:MRK),那么您需要查看它的股东登记表的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,占比78%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Merck.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了默沙东的不同所有权组的股权。

big
NYSE:MRK Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
NYSE:MRk所有权结构拆分图(2024年7月15日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Merck?

机构所有权对默沙东预示着什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Merck already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Merck's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

默沙东已经有机构登记在股东名册上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过该股票并且他们喜欢它。但是和其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果多个机构同时改变对一支股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看默沙东以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:MRK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
NYSE:MRk盈利和营业收入增长图(2024年7月15日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Merck. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.6% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有超过半数的已发行股票,董事会可能会需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对冲基金在默沙东没有实质性的投资。我们的数据显示,The Vanguard Group,Inc. 是最大的股东,拥有已发行股票的9.6%。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有已发行股票的8.2%和4.6%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师建议是了解股票预期表现的更深入的做法。相当多的分析师都对该股票进行了研究,因此您可以轻松地查看预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Merck

默沙东的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Merck & Co., Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$217m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据表明,内部人员在Merck & Co.,Inc.的个人名下拥有不到1%的股份。由于公司规模如此之大,我们不会期望内部人员拥有公司股份的很大比例。他们共拥有2,170万美元的股票。董事会成员拥有公司股份是好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般投资者--包括散户--持有该公司22%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这种拥有股份的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面促使政策决策的改变,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Merck that you should be aware of.

我发现看一家公司究竟由谁拥有很有趣。但是为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了默沙东的4个警示信号,您应该意识到他们。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发