The Recent 3.3% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Yiwen Zhu's Week, Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co., Limited's (HKG:6078) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 3.3% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Yiwen Zhu's Week, Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co., Limited's (HKG:6078) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
主要见解
- Hygeia Healthcare Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 54% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- 35% of Hygeia Healthcare Holdings is held by Institutions
- 海吉亚医疗控股的重要内部持股表明了对公司扩张的固有利益。
- 前三大股东持有该企业54%的股份。
- 海吉亚医疗控股的35%由机构持有。
If you want to know who really controls Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co., Limited (HKG:6078), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正掌控着海吉亚医疗控股有限公司(HKG:6078),那么你必须看看它的股份登记簿组成。在公司中持有最多股份的集团,精确地说是约45%,是个人内部持有人。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大的收益(或如果出现下降,则会失去最多)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.3% gain.
因此,内部持有人是上周3.3%收益的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hygeia Healthcare Holdings.
让我们更详细地了解一下不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于海吉亚医疗控股的什么。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-e1eaeb5e20a7089aa19dee1aaf65babd-0-c9edca7c1f19d3164933f31cb34d7817.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hygeia Healthcare Holdings?
机构投资者持有的股份告诉我们关于海吉亚医疗控股的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hygeia Healthcare Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hygeia Healthcare Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在海吉亚医疗控股持有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看了看这只股票,而且他们很喜欢它。但与其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,有必要检查海吉亚医疗控股的过去收益轨迹(下面)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-e1eaeb5e20a7089aa19dee1aaf65babd-1-2dd77bbe0d6b7f10048d7caaac0463f7.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hygeia Healthcare Holdings. With a 44% stake, CEO Yiwen Zhu is the largest shareholder. The second and third largest shareholders are Fidelity International Ltd and E Fund Management Co., Ltd., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 5.0%.
对于海吉亚医疗控股,对冲基金没有太多股份。占44%的首席执行官朱义文是最大的股东。第二和第三大股东是富达国际有限公司和易方达管理有限公司,他们的股份数量相等,均为5.0%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Hygeia Healthcare Holdings
海吉亚医疗控股的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Hygeia Healthcare Holdings Co., Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$7.5b stake in this HK$17b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看来内部人士拥有海吉亚医疗控股股份的比例相当大。看到内部人士在这家170亿港元企业中持有约75亿港元的股份非常有趣。看到这种投资水平是好的。你可以在这里查看内部人员最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Hygeia Healthcare Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有海吉亚医疗控股的20%股份。尽管所有权规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,也许还不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。