share_log

CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600084) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 11% Last Week

CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600084) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 11% Last Week

中信尼雅酒业有限公司(SHSE:600084)最大的股东是一些私营企业,在上周股价飙升11%后变得更富有了。
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 02:00

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in CITIC Niya Wine indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 12% of CITIC Niya Wine is held by insiders
  • 中信尼雅酒业被私人企业广泛持有,意味着它们共同对管理和业务策略有更大的发言权。
  • 公司前2名股东持有56%的股份
  • 中信尼雅酒业有12%的股份被内部人士持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600084), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解中信尼雅酒业股份有限公司(SHSE:600084)真正的控制者,了解公司的所有权结构十分重要。我们可以看到,私人企业拥有该公司47%的所有权。换句话说,这个集团会从他们对公司的投资中获得最多的(或者失去最多的)。

Clearly, private companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥528m last week.

显然,上周该公司的市值上涨52800万人民币后,私人企业获益最多。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CITIC Niya Wine, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨中信尼雅酒业的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。

big
SHSE:600084 Ownership Breakdown July 16th 2024
SHSE:600084的所有权状况于2024年7月16日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CITIC Niya Wine?

中信尼雅酒业缺乏机构股东对我们意味着什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of CITIC Niya Wine, for yourself, below.

一个公司没有机构股东可能有很多原因。如果流动性(每日交易的股票数量)很低,机构可能难以大量买入股票。如果公司没有需要筹资,机构可能缺乏建立头寸的机会。也有可能基金经理人没有持有这种股票,因为他们不相信它会表现良好。机构投资者可能不认为该业务的历史增长值得一提,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。下面你可以看到中信尼雅酒业的过去营业收入表现。

big
SHSE:600084 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 16th 2024
SHSE:600084的收益和营业收入增长于2024年7月16日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in CITIC Niya Wine. CITIC Guoan Group Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 45% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 1.8% of the stock.

对中信尼雅酒业而言,对冲基金的持股不多。中信国安集团股份有限公司是目前持有该公司45%流通股的最大股东。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有该公司约11%和1.8%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

尽管研究一家公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增添价值,但研究分析师建议以深入了解股票的预期表现也是一个好的做法。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此可能为人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of CITIC Niya Wine

中信尼雅酒业的内部人士持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥641m worth of shares in the CN¥5.4b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有中信尼雅酒业股份相当大。内部人士持有这家市值54亿人民币公司的6410万人民币股份。我们认为这显示股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人士可能是创立了这家公司。你可以在这里查看这些内部人员是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CITIC Niya Wine. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

随着41%的股份,普通公众,大多由个人投资者组成,对中信尼雅酒业有一定的影响力。虽然他们不能称霸大局,但他们确实对公司的运行产生了实质性的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 47%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人企业拥有已发行股份中的47%。深入研究这个问题可能是值得的。如果相关方,如内部人士,对其中一个私人企业产生兴趣,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私人企业也可能对公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for CITIC Niya Wine (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

我发现了解一家公司实际上由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正得到洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现中信尼雅酒业的两个警告信号(其中一个不应被忽视!),你应该了解一下。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发