share_log

Is T-Mobile US (NASDAQ:TMUS) A Risky Investment?

Is T-Mobile US (NASDAQ:TMUS) A Risky Investment?

t-mobile us(纳斯达克:TMUS)是否是一个有风险的投资?
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 07:18

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

作为投资者,有些人认为波动性而不是债务是思考风险的最佳途径,但沃伦·巴菲特曾著名地说,“波动性远非风险的同义词”。当我们考虑一家公司有多大的风险时,我们总是希望看看它使用债务的情况,因为债务超载会导致崩溃。重要的是,t-mobile us承担债务。但是股东是否应该担心它使用债务?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务带来了什么风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业成长的工具,但如果企业无力偿还其贷款人,那么企业就处于他们的威胁之下。如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能会一无所有。然而,更频繁(但仍然代价昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低于市场价格的价格发行股票,从而永久稀释股东权益,以支撑其资产负债表。当然,在资本密集型行业中,债务可能是一种重要的工具。当我们思考公司使用债务时,我们首先看现金和债务两者之和。

What Is T-Mobile US's Net Debt?

t-Mobile US的净债务是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 T-Mobile US had debt of US$78.2b, up from US$74.7b in one year. On the flip side, it has US$6.71b in cash leading to net debt of about US$71.5b.

下面的图片显示,截至2024年3月,t-mobile us的债务为782亿美元,比一年前的747亿美元增加了。另一方面,它有6710万美元的现金,导致净债务约为715亿美元。

big
NasdaqGS:TMUS Debt to Equity History July 16th 2024
nasdaq:tmus负债权益历史记录截至2024年7月16日

How Healthy Is T-Mobile US' Balance Sheet?

t-Mobile US的资产负债表状况如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, T-Mobile US had liabilities of US$20.6b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$123.6b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$6.71b as well as receivables valued at US$8.76b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$128.7b.

根据最后一份报表,t-mobile us的负债包括206亿美元的短期负债和1236亿美元的长期负债。抵消这些负债,它有6710万美元的现金以及8760万美元的应收账款,这些应收账款在一年内到期。因此,它的负债超过了现金和(短期)应收账款的总和1287亿美元。

This deficit is considerable relative to its very significant market capitalization of US$211.0b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on T-Mobile US' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

与其相当巨大的市值2110亿美元相比,这个亏损是相当大的,所以它确实表明股东应该关注t-Mobile US的债务使用情况。如果它的放贷人要求其加强资产负债表,股东可能会面临严重的稀释。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

T-Mobile US has net debt worth 2.4 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 4.8 times the interest expense. While that doesn't worry us too much, it does suggest the interest payments are somewhat of a burden. If T-Mobile US can keep growing EBIT at last year's rate of 17% over the last year, then it will find its debt load easier to manage. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine T-Mobile US's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

t-Mobile US的净债务相当于EBITDA的2.4倍,这并不是太多,但它的利息覆盖率看起来有点低,EBIt只有利息费用的4.8倍。虽然这不会使我们太担心,但它确实表明利息支出在某种程度上是负担。如果t-Mobile US能够保持去年17%的EBIt增长率,那么它将发现自己更容易管理债务负担。没有什么比从资产负债表中了解债务更重要的了。但最终,决定t-Mobile US能否保持健康的资产负债表去向的是未来的收入。因此,如果您想看看专业人士的看法,您可能会发现这份有关分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, T-Mobile US recorded free cash flow of 25% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最后,一家企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能解决问题。因此,合乎逻辑的方法是查看与实际自由现金流匹配的EBIt比例。在过去三年中,t-Mobile US的自由现金流占其EBIt的25%,这比我们预期的要弱一些。在偿还债务方面,这并不好。

Our View

我们的观点

T-Mobile US's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and level of total liabilities definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But it seems to be able to grow its EBIT without much trouble. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that T-Mobile US is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 2 warning signs with T-Mobile US , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

t-Mobile US的EBIt转为自由现金流和总负债水平确实对我们产生了影响。但它似乎能够轻松增长其EBIt。从上面提到的所有角度来看,我们认为t-Mobile US作为一家负债较高的公司,是一个有一定风险的投资。这并不一定是一件坏事,因为杠杆可以提高股本回报率,但这是需要注意的事情。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是明显的起点。但最终,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表之外的风险。我们已经确定了t-Mobile US的两个预警信号,并理解它们应该是您投资过程中的一部分。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

总的来说,专注于没有净债务的公司往往更好。您可以访问我们的特别列表,其中包含这些公司(所有这些公司都有盈利增长的记录)。这是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发