Recent Uptick Might Appease Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC) Institutional Owners After Losing 12% Over the Past Year
Recent Uptick Might Appease Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC) Institutional Owners After Losing 12% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构所有权的持续增加意味着Peapack-Gladstone Financial的股价对它们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 前11大股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:PGC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation(纳斯达克:PGC),那么你需要看看它的股权登记簿构成。拥有公司股份数量最多的持有者是机构,具体来说是约75%。换句话说,该集团面临的上行潜力(或下行风险)最大。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 15% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 12%.
机构投资者很欣赏上周15%股价的增长,鉴于他们的一年损失总计达到令人失望的12%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Peapack-Gladstone Financial.
让我们更仔细地查看不同类型的股东对Peapack-Gladstone Financial的影响。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-d645d7767bb65913798401b0dd2587da-0-1fd4794339cf9d75632d67171f4b751d.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
机构所有权告诉我们Peapack-Gladstone Financial的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Peapack-Gladstone Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Peapack-Gladstone Financial持有相当多的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们很喜欢它。但像任何人一样,他们也可能错了。当多个机构持有一只股票时,它们总是有可能进行 '人头攒动交易',这种情况下,多方可能会竞相快速售出股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Peapack-Gladstone Financial的历史收益和收入,但请记住,这个故事总是更加复杂。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-d645d7767bb65913798401b0dd2587da-1-12bcb1fd8138e57b41d8243848a1df5b.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 8.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 6.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Douglas Kennedy, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
机构投资者持有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会决策。我们注意到,对于Peapack-Gladstone Financial,对冲基金的投资并没有很大的意义。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大股东是BlackRock,Inc.,持有8.3%的流通股。同时,第二大和第三大股东,分别持有流通股的7.1%和6.1%。此外,我们发现CEO Douglas Kennedy名下的股份分配为0.5%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的了解,我们发现前11名在该公司拥有51%的所有权,表明没有单一的股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Peapack-Gladstone Financial
Peapack-Gladstone Financial的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$425m, and insiders have US$45m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人员拥有相当比例的Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation股份。它的市值只有4250万美元,内部人员名下持有4500万美元的股票。我们可以说这显示了他们和股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,公司规模仍然相当小;一些内部人员可能创立了这个公司。 点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买卖股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Peapack-Gladstone Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有Peapack-Gladstone Financial 15%的股份。尽管持股量相当可观,但如果他们的决策与其他大股东不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Peapack-Gladstone Financial .
我非常有兴趣查看到底是谁拥有一家公司。但为了真正获得洞见,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意Peapack-Gladstone Financial的两个警告信号 。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。