With 79% Ownership in UMB Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:UMBF), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 79% Ownership in UMB Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:UMBF), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies UMB Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 10 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构的持股份额高意味着UMb金融的股价对它们的交易行动非常敏感。
- 前十大股东拥有该公司52%的股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of UMB Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:UMBF) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看UMb金融公司(纳斯达克:UMBF)的股东,我们可以知道哪个集团最有权势。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的绝大部分股份,拥有79%的所有权。换句话说,该集团将从其对该公司的投资中获得最多(或者输掉最多)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$4.4b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 48%.
上周,机构投资者在该公司达到US $ 44亿市值后最终获益最大。上周的收益将进一步提高股东在一年内的回报率,目前为48%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about UMB Financial.
让我们仔细观察一下不同类型的股东,以了解他们对UMb金融有哪些说法。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UMB Financial?
机构持股有什么提示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that UMB Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see UMB Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到UMb金融确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是最好注意不要依赖机构投资者所谓的认证。他们也会犯错。当多个机构拥有某个股票时,总会存在他们处于一个“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这种交易失败时,多个方可能竞相快速卖出股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到UMb金融的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住这只是故事的一部分。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in UMB Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that J. Kemper, the CEO has 4.0% of the shares allocated to their name.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有该公司的超过一半股份,因此他们可以共同行使重大的权力。对UMb金融而言,对冲基金的股份较少。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是贝莱德(BlackRock,Inc.),持有该公司已发行股票的12%。提供背景,第二大股东持有约9.7%的已发行股票,第三大股东持有5.6%的股份。另外,我们发现首席执行官J. Kemper拥有他们名下分配的4.0%股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前10大股东持有超过半数股份,有一些较小的股东以一定程度上平衡更大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of UMB Financial
UMb金融内部股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in UMB Financial Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$207m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以看到UMb金融公司内部人员拥有其股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些具有潜在意义的一致性是相当积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约US $ 20700万的股份(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会认为这显示了股东与董事会之间的关注点一致。但是,检查这些内部人员是否一直在卖出股票可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in UMB Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有UMb金融的14%股权。虽然持有的规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,则可能无法改变公司策略。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand UMB Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for UMB Financial that you should be aware of.
想了解持有一个公司股权的不同集团总是值得的。但要更好地了解UMb金融公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了UMb金融公司的1个警示标志,您应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。