ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 52% Loss Over the Past Year
ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 52% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ZipRecruiter's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 7 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 考虑到机构对公司大量持股,ZipRecruiter的股价可能会受到他们的交易决策的影响。
- 前7大股东拥有公司50%的股份
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 46% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要真正了解ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP)的控制权,理解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。拥有公司最多股份的集团,确切地说,约占46%的是机构。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
Institutional investors would appreciate the 7.1% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 52%.
考虑到机构投资者在近一年中的亏损高达52%,他们对于上周股价上涨7.1%的增长应该会感到满意。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ZipRecruiter, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探究ZipRecruiter的每一种业主类型,从下面的图表开始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240717/0-816380786f0a7f1911f01de1ccd4e264-0-6dc661753ddc9421ccb4dde0d2909f42.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZipRecruiter?
机构所有权对ZipRecruiter有什么影响?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ZipRecruiter. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ZipRecruiter's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在ZipRecruiter拥有相当大的利益。这可能表明该公司在投资界拥有一定的信誉度。然而,仍要谨慎依赖机构投资者所谓的认可,因为他们也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变其对股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,看一下ZipRecruiter下面的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是最重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240717/0-816380786f0a7f1911f01de1ccd4e264-1-349bcd3da991a9cae23242b9e8b49c53.png/big)
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.1% of ZipRecruiter. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Siegel Family Trust, with ownership of 14%. With 8.5% and 7.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Institutional Venture Partners are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们的数据显示,对于ZipRecruiter,对冲基金拥有6.1%的股份。这引起了我的关注,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层或带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变化。该公司最大的股东是Siegel Family Trust,持有14%的股份。The Vanguard Group, Inc.和Institutional Venture Partners分别占已发行股票的8.5%和7.7%,是第二大和第三大股东。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
经过进一步检查,我们发现该公司超过一半的股权由前7大股东持有,这意味着较小股东的利益在一定程度上可以平衡较大股东的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of ZipRecruiter
ZipRecruiter内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in ZipRecruiter, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$847m, and insiders have US$31m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有ZipRecruiter, Inc.的一些股份。该公司的市值仅为84700万美元,内部人员自有股份达3100万美元。这至少表明了某种程度上的一致性。您可以单击此处查看内部人员是否一直在购买或出售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众(包括散户投资者)拥有该公司的23%股权,因此他们不容易被忽视。尽管该群体不能一呼百应,但肯定会对公司的运营产生实际影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 7.6%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
拥有7.6%的私人股本公司有能力在股东创造价值上发挥作用。一些投资者可能会因此感到鼓舞,因为私人股本有时能够鼓励帮助市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能在上市后退出投资。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司拥有该公司14%的股份。深入了解一下可能是值得的。如果相关方,如内部人员,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ZipRecruiter better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that ZipRecruiter is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
始终考虑到持股公司不同的群体是值得的。但是为了更好地了解ZipRecruiter,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,ZipRecruiter在我们的投资分析中显示了2个警告信号,您需要知道……
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。