Daily Journal Corporation's (NASDAQ:DJCO) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 16% Over the Past Week
Daily Journal Corporation's (NASDAQ:DJCO) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 16% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Daily Journal's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构大量持股意味着每日期刊的股价对它们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 共有7家投资者拥有该公司的51%所有权。
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Daily Journal Corporation (NASDAQ:DJCO), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解每日日报公司(纳斯达克:DJCO)真正的控制者,了解业务的所有权结构是非常重要的。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有52%的所有权。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上升潜力(或下降风险) 。
Last week's 16% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 54%.
上周的16%涨幅意味着机构投资者处于积极的一面,即使公司也表现出强劲的长期趋势。上周的收益将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为54%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Daily Journal.
在下面的图表中,我们会对每牌日报的不同所有权群体进行详细分析。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Daily Journal?
机构持股给每日期刊公司提供了什么样的信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Daily Journal. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Daily Journal, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在每日日报中拥有相当大的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图出售一只股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此,检查每日日报过去的收益轨迹(如下所示)是值得的。当然, 还需要考虑其他因素。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Daily Journal is not owned by hedge funds. RWWM, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.5% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的发行股份,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。每日日报不是由对冲基金拥有的。RWWm公司目前是该公司最大的股东,占已发行股份的23%。 同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的9.5%和6.9%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
经过进一步检查,我们发现该公司超过一半的股权由前7大股东持有,这意味着较小股东的利益在一定程度上可以平衡较大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京证券复合材料公司内部所有权情况
Insider Ownership Of Daily Journal
每日期刊的内部股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Daily Journal Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$596m, and insiders have US$57m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以看到内部人员拥有每日期刊公司的股份。它的市值仅为5960万美元,内部人员在自己的名字下拥有5700万美元的股份。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但最好检查那些内部人员是否一直在卖出股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众--包括零售投资者--持有公司的38%股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管这种规模的持股较大,但如果决策与其他大股东不协调,可能无法改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Daily Journal that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了Daily Journal的1个警告信号,您应该注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最好的购买股票。因此,查看这份免费免费的有趣公司列表可能会有所帮助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。