Institutional Investors Control 69% of Mitek Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MITK) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 12%
Institutional Investors Control 69% of Mitek Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MITK) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 12%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Mitek Systems implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 14 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构对Mitek Systems持有的大量股份意味着他们对该公司的股价有重大影响力。
- 前14大股东拥有该公司的51%。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Mitek Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MITK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 69% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Mitek Systems, Inc. (纳斯达克代码:MITK) 的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。在该公司持有最多股份的群体中,确切地说是约69%的机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$540m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 15% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周机构投资者最终从公司市值达到5400万美元中获益最多。目前的投资回报率为15%,上周的收益应该会更受欢迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Mitek Systems.
让我们更仔细地了解一下不同类型的股东对Mitek Systems的意义。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mitek Systems?
机构所有权对Mitek Systems公司有何启示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Mitek Systems already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Mitek Systems' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Mitek Systems的股份登记簿上已经有机构了。实际上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好要警惕依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓认证。他们也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变他们对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Mitek Systems的下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.1% of Mitek Systems. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 7.8%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能会注意到他们的偏好。我们的数据表明,对Mitek Systems的持有比例为6.1%的对冲基金。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或引起会为股东创造近期价值的变革。该公司最大的股东是黑石集团(BlackRock, Inc.),持有7.8%的股份。为了获得背景,持有这些股票的第二大股东持有约7.5%的流通股份,第三大股东持有6.1%的流通股。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记簿中可以看出,51%的股权由前14名股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Mitek Systems
Mitek Systems的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Mitek Systems, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$13m worth of stock in the US$540m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告,内部人员确实持有Mitek Systems, Inc.的股份。在他们自己的名字下,内部人员拥有价值1300万美元的在这个市值为5400万美元的公司的股票。这至少显示出一定的一致性。你可以点击这里查看那些内部人员是否一直在购买或出售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Mitek Systems. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有Mitek Systems的23%股份。虽然拥有这样规模的所有权是相当可观的,但如果决定不与其他大股东保持一致,可能并不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Mitek Systems , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我很有兴趣看看到底是谁拥有一家公司。但是,为了真正了解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的永恒幽灵。我们已经确定了Mitek Systems的2个警告信号,了解它们应该是您的投资过程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。