share_log

Precigen, Inc. (NASDAQ:PGEN) Surges 21%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 36% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

Precigen, Inc. (NASDAQ:PGEN) Surges 21%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 36% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

precigen公司(NASDAQ:PGEN)涨21% ;拥有36%股份的私人股权投资公司和机构也跟着获利。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 12:34

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Precigen by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Institutions own 30% of Precigen
  • 私募股权公司对Precigen的重要控制意味着,普通公众更有权力影响管理和治理相关决策。
  • 前三大股东持有该业务的51%。
  • 机构持有Precigen的30%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Precigen, Inc. (NASDAQ:PGEN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is private equity firms. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解Precigen, Inc. (纳斯达克:PGEN)的实际掌控人,了解该公司的所有权结构是很重要的。持有公司最多股份的集团,约占36%的是私募股权公司。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大的收益(或者如果出现下滑,可能损失最多)。

Private equity firms gained the most after market cap touched US$415m last week, while institutions who own 30% also benefitted.

私募股权公司和持有30%的机构在市值上周达到41500万美元后获益最多。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Precigen.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东对Precigen能告诉我们什么。

big
NasdaqGS:PGEN Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
纳斯达克:PGEN于2024年7月17日的所有权分布。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Precigen?

机构投资者在Precigen中拥有相当多的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但是,由于机构有时会犯错误的投资决定,这个事实本身不足为据。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总有一个风险,即它们在一个“拥挤贸易”中。如果这种交易失败,多个方将可能竞相快速出售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看下面Precigen的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住故事总是多方面的。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Precigen. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Precigen's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

纳斯达克:PGEN于2024年7月17日的盈利和收入增长。

big
NasdaqGS:PGEN Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
Precigen不是由对冲基金持有。Third Security, LLC是目前公司的最大股东,持有36%的股票。其次和第三大股东分别是E. Merck KG和Patient Capital Management, LLC,持有流通股的8.2%和6.9%。此外,我们发现,首席执行官Helen Sabzevari拥有0.9%的股票。

Precigen is not owned by hedge funds. Third Security, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. With 8.2% and 6.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, E. Merck KG and Patient Capital Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Helen Sabzevari, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

我们可以看到公司内部人员拥有Precigen, Inc. (纳斯达克:PGEN)的股份。市值仅为4150万美元,内部人员持有价值1600万美元的股份。一些人可能会说这表明了股东和董事会之间的利益协调。但是,检查这些内部人员是否有过出售可能是值得的。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股情况是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以取得相同的结果。相当多的分析师涵盖了这笔股票,所以你可以很容易地调查预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Precigen

拥有36%股份的私募股权公司可能会影响Precigen的董事会。有些投资者可能对此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权公司有时能够鼓励市场看到公司的价值。此外,这些持股人可能会在将其公开上市后退出该投资。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Precigen, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$415m, and insiders have US$16m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司股份的8.2%。这可能值得更深入地研究。如果相关方,例如内部人员,对其中一家私人公司有利益,应在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对公司有战略利益。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般投资者--包括散户--持有该公司22%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这种拥有股份的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面促使政策决策的改变,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With a stake of 36%, private equity firms could influence the Precigen board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

我觉得看公司的具体股东非常有趣。但要真正获得见解,我们需要考虑其他信息。因此,您应该了解我们发现的一项警告信号。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.2%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司股份的8.2%。这可能值得更深入地研究。如果相关方,例如内部人员,对其中一家私人公司有利益,应在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Precigen .

我认为查看谁确切地拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得见解,我们需要考虑其他信息。因此,您应该了解我们发现的一项警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发