share_log

We Think Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

We Think Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

我们认为阿姆斯特朗工业(NYSE:AWI)可以控制其债务。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 14:03

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (NYSE:AWI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性远非风险的代名词。” 当我们考虑一家公司的风险程度时,我们总是喜欢看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过载会导致破产。我们注意到阿姆斯特朗工业公司(NYSE:AWI)的资产负债表上确实有债务。但真正的问题是,这些债务是否使该公司存在风险。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

债务是帮助企业成长的工具,但如果企业无力偿还债务,那么它就存在于银行家的掌控之下。资本主义的一部分是“创造性毁灭”的过程,这是一种银行家无情清算失败企业的过程。然而,更常见(但仍然痛苦)的情况是,企业需要以低价募集新的股本资金,因此永久性地稀释股东的股份。当然,许多公司利用债务资金进行增长,并没有出现任何负面后果。在审查债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平的总体情况。

What Is Armstrong World Industries's Debt?

阿姆斯特朗工业的债务情况是什么?

As you can see below, Armstrong World Industries had US$582.3m of debt at March 2024, down from US$666.2m a year prior. However, it does have US$71.5m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$510.8m.

正如您下面所看到的,截至2024年3月,阿姆斯特朗工业的债务为58230万美元,较前一年的66620万美元有所下降。但是,它拥有7150万美元的现金来抵消这些债务,因此净债务约为51080万美元。

big
NYSE:AWI Debt to Equity History July 17th 2024
NYSE:AWI债务股本比历史记录为什么? 2024年7月17日

A Look At Armstrong World Industries' Liabilities

看一下阿姆斯特朗工业的负债情况

The latest balance sheet data shows that Armstrong World Industries had liabilities of US$184.4m due within a year, and liabilities of US$880.3m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$71.5m as well as receivables valued at US$125.8m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$867.4m.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,阿姆斯特朗工业在未来一年内需要偿还的债务为18440万美元,未来需要偿还的债务为88030万美元。抵消这些责任的是,它拥有7150万美元的现金以及12580万美元的应收账款在12个月内到期。因此,其负债比其现金和(短期)应收账款的总和多86740万美元。

Given Armstrong World Industries has a market capitalization of US$5.16b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考虑到阿姆斯特朗工业的市值为5.16亿美元,很难相信这些负债构成了多大的威胁。话虽如此,很明显我们应该继续监控其资产负债表,以防其恶化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通过查看公司的净债务与利息、税、折旧、摊销前利润(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息费用(利息覆盖率)可以衡量一个公司的债务负担与收益能力。因此,我们考虑将债务与有无计算折旧和摊销费用的收益相对比。

With net debt sitting at just 1.5 times EBITDA, Armstrong World Industries is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 8.0 times the interest expense over the last year. Also good is that Armstrong World Industries grew its EBIT at 11% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Armstrong World Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

阿姆斯特朗工业的净债务/ EBITDA仅为1.5倍,可谓相当保守的财务杠杆。此外,其利息覆盖率良好,过去一年中EBIt为利息支出的8.0倍。此外,阿姆斯特朗工业去年的EBIt增长了11%,进一步增加了管理债务的能力。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Armstrong World Industries recorded free cash flow worth 54% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能解决这个问题。因此,我们总是检查每个EBIt产生了多少自由现金流。在过去的三年中,阿姆斯特朗工业记录的自由现金流价值相当于其EBIt的54%,这在某种程度上是正常的,因为自由现金流不包括利息和税款。这种自由现金流让公司有能力在适当时候偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

We feel that Armstrong World Industries's solid interest cover was really heart warming, like a mid-winter fair trade hot chocolate in a tasteful alpine chalet. And its apparent ability to to grow its EBIT is also rather rousing! All these things considered, it appears that Armstrong World Industries can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Armstrong World Industries you should be aware of.

我们认为,阿姆斯特朗工业可靠的利息覆盖率真是让人感到温暖,就像在时尚的阿尔卑斯山小屋里喝一款公平贸易的热巧克力。而其明显的EBIt增长能力也相当激动人心!考虑到所有这些因素,阿姆斯特朗工业似乎可以轻松应对其目前的债务水平。当然,虽然这种杠杆可以提高股本回报率,但还会带来更大的风险,因此值得密切关注。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要关注的领域。但从根本上讲,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范畴的风险。事实证明:我们已经发现阿姆斯特朗工业的1个警示信号,您应该注意。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发