The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:605228) Insiders Who Own 72% of the Company
The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:605228) Insiders Who Own 72% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Shentong Technology Group's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 56% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Lifeng Fang)
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 申通科技集团重要的内部股权暗示了对公司扩张的潜在利益。
- 一名股东(房立峰)持有该公司56%的股份。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
Every investor in Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd (SHSE:605228) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
对于申通科技集团股份有了解的投资者应该注意最强大的股东集团。 我们可以看到,个人内部股东拥有公司的大部分股权达72%。 换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥486m.
因此,内部股东集体在市值下跌4,8600万元后经历了最高的亏损。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shentong Technology Group.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对申通科技集团有什么影响。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shentong Technology Group?
机构所有权告诉我们有关申通科技集团的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Less than 5% of Shentong Technology Group is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
申通科技集团少于5%的股份归机构投资者所有。 这表明一些基金正在观察这家公司,但许多人尚未购买股票。 如果该业务从这里变得更强大,我们可能会看到更多机构希望购买。 如果多个机构投资者同时试图购买股票,那么股价上涨也很常见。 因此,请注意下面的历史收益轨迹,但请记住,最重要的是未来。
Shentong Technology Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Lifeng Fang with 56% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 6.0% of the stock.
申通科技集团没有被对冲基金持有。 查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是房立峰,持有56%的流通股。 这意味着他们对公司未来的控制权很大。 相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约15%和6.0%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但同时调查分析师建议也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们目前没有发现任何关于该公司的分析师报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shentong Technology Group
申通科技集团的内部股权。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Shentong Technology Group Co., Ltd. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own CN¥2.6b worth of shares in the CN¥3.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息表明,内部人员拥有申通科技集团有超过一半的股份。 这使他们有效地控制了公司。 这意味着他们拥有37亿元公司中26亿元的股份。 这相当有意义。 您可以在此处检查这些内部人员近期是否购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shentong Technology Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有19%的普通公众,主要是个人投资者,对申通科技集团有一定影响力。 尽管这个群体不能占据主导地位,但它肯定可以对公司的运营产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 6.0%, of the Shentong Technology Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司拥有申通科技集团6.0%的股份。 私人公司可能是相关方。 有时内部人员通过在私人公司中持有而不是以个人身份持有一家上市公司来拥有对上市公司的利益。 尽管很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得进一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shentong Technology Group (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .
我发现查看公司所有权非常有趣。 但是,为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。 因此,您应该了解我们发现的两个警告信号,其中一个信号不太好。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。