share_log

Institutional Investors in Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) See US$89m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) See US$89m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

尽管机构投资者看到Liquidia Corporation (纳斯达克股票代码:LQDA)的市值上周下降了8900万美元,但他们从长期的获益中受益。开多
Simply Wall St ·  07/18 13:03

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Liquidia implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • 11% of Liquidia is held by insiders
  • 机构持有大量Liquidia股份表明他们对公司股价具有重大影响力。
  • 前7名股东拥有公司的54%。
  • Liquidia的11%由内部人士持有。

If you want to know who really controls Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想了解谁真正控制Liquidia Corporation(纳斯达克:LQDA),那么你需要查看公司股权登记簿的构成。机构持有42%的股份,是公司最大的股东。这意味着如果股票上涨(或遇到低迷行情),该机构群体将获得最大收益(或者遭受最大损失)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 9.3% in value last week. However, the 43% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

没有股东喜欢在投资中亏钱,尤其是机构投资者,上周他们看到自己的持股价值下降了9.3%。然而,43%的一年回报可能有助于缓解他们的总体损失。我们假设,他们将密切关注未来的弱点。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Liquidia, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解Liquidia每种所有者的情况,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqCM:LQDA Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
纳斯达克创业板:LQDA所有权分布2024年7月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Liquidia?

机构持有权对Liquidia有什么影响?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Liquidia already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Liquidia, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Liquidia的股权登记簿已经有机构持有。确实,他们在公司里拥有可观的股份。这表明专业投资者间对公司的信誉性有所认可。但不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,有必要检查Liquidia的过去收益轨迹(如下图所示)。当然,也要考虑其他因素。

big
NasdaqCM:LQDA Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
纳斯达克创业板:LQDA利润和营业收入增长情况2024年7月18日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 15% of Liquidia. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Caligan Partners, LP is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC and Patient Square Capital, LP, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.4%. Furthermore, CEO Roger Jeffs is the owner of 2.6% of the company's shares.

我们的数据显示,对于Liquidia,对冲基金拥有15%的所有权。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可能非常活跃和行动派。许多人寻找中期的催化剂,以推高股价。我们的数据显示,Caligan Partners,LP是最大的股东,持有15%的流通股。第二和第三大股东是Legend Aggregator Advisors,LLC和Patient Square Capital,LP,他们的股份相等,各自持有9.4%的股份。此外,首席执行官Roger Jeffs拥有公司2.6%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现该公司超过一半的股权由前7大股东持有,这意味着较小股东的利益在一定程度上可以平衡较大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Liquidia

Liquidia的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Liquidia Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$980m, and insiders have US$110m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Liquidia Corporation的大量股权。其市值仅为9800万美元,而内部人士自己持有价值1,100万美元的股份。这可能表明公司的创始人仍拥有很多股份。点击此处查看他们是否有买卖行为。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Liquidia. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

个人投资者(大多数是散户)持有Liquidia 13%的股权,对Liquidia具有某种影响力。虽然拥有此类股份很重要,但如果决策与其他大型股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司策略。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With a stake of 9.4%, private equity firms could influence the Liquidia board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

持有9.4%股份的私募股权公司可能会对Liquidia的董事会产生影响。有些人可能喜欢这一点,因为私募股权公司有时会是激进派,会追责管理层。但有时,私募股权公司正在卖出,并上市公司。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 9.4%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司9.4%的股份。仅凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方可能通过单独的私人公司拥有公共公司的股份利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Liquidia .

我非常感兴趣看看谁真正拥有公司。但为了获得真正的洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该知道我们在Liquidia上发现的1个警告信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发