share_log

Merck Gets Legal Victory As Appeals Court Dismisses Shingles Vaccine Some 1,200 Lawsuits

Merck Gets Legal Victory As Appeals Court Dismisses Shingles Vaccine Some 1,200 Lawsuits

默沙东获得法律胜利,上诉法院驳回1,200起带状疱疹生物-疫苗诉讼。
Benzinga ·  14:55

Merck & Co Inc (NYSE:MRK) has reportedly secured a significant legal victory as the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of nearly 1,200 lawsuits concerning its Zostavax shingles vaccine.

据报道,默沙东公司(NYSE:MRK)在其疱疹带状疱疹疫苗 Zostavax 上获得了重大的法律胜利,第三巡回上诉法院维持了撤销近 1,200 起诉案件的裁决。

The court ruled that U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle did not exceed his authority when he dismissed cases for failing to provide required clinical test results in response to a Lone Pine order.

法院裁定,美国地区法官哈维·巴特尔未超出职权范围,因被告未能在对 Lone Pine 订单的回应中提供必要的临床测试结果而撤销了这些案件。

Mass torts increasingly use these orders to demand initial evidence, such as medical records, to substantiate claims early on.

集体诉讼越来越多地使用这些命令来要求初始证据,例如医疗记录,以尽早验证索赔。

Also Read: What's Going On With Merck Stock On Monday?

还阅读:默沙东股票周一怎么了?

Judge Bartle initiated the Lone Pine order in early 2022 following Merck's success in five bellwether cases, where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate through a PCR test that the vaccine, rather than prior exposure to the chickenpox virus, caused their shingles.

在默沙东成功进行 5 起分界审判案件之后,巴特尔法官于 2022 年初发布了 Lone Pine 订单,在此期间原告未能通过 PCR 检测证明疫苗而非先前暴露于水痘病毒导致了带状疱疹。

Reuters added that the order mandated all remaining plaintiffs to produce similar clinical evidence to support their claims.

据路透社报道,该命令要求所有剩余的原告提供类似的临床证据来支持其索赔。

Plaintiffs' attorneys argued that PCR tests were not standard practice for diagnosing shingles, leading to a lack of available test results.

原告律师主张,PCR 测试不是诊断带状疱疹的标准做法,导致缺乏可用的测试结果。

Merck countered that the cases lacked merit without conclusive evidence linking the vaccine to shingles.

默沙东反驳说,这些案件缺乏证明疫苗与带状疱疹之间存在确定性联系的证据。

Despite opposition, Judge Bartle dismissed all cases, emphasizing the failure to provide adequate scientific backing for their claims.

尽管遭到反对,巴特尔法官撤销了所有案件,强调未能提供足够的科学依据支持其索赔。

The 3rd Circuit upheld Bartle's decision, stating that plaintiffs had sufficient opportunity to justify their claims without PCR tests but failed to present alternative methodologies or scientific studies.

第三巡回上诉法院维持了巴特尔的决定,称原告有足够的机会在没有PCR测试的情况下证明其索赔,但未能提出替代方法或科学研究。

The court affirmed Bartle's discretion to manage the multidistrict litigation efficiently, albeit with acknowledgment of limits to judicial discretion.

尽管承认司法裁量权的局限性,法院确认了巴特尔有效地管理多地诉讼的权利。

Price Action: MRK stock is down 2.18% at $123.14 at last check Thursday.

价格走势:MRK 股票周四最后交易时下跌 2.18%,至 123.14 美元。

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

免责声明:本内容部分使用人工智能工具生成,并经Benzinga编辑审核发布。

  • FDA Declines To Approve Merck-Daiichi Sankyo Partnered Lung Cancer Drug.
  • FDA 拒绝批准默沙东-第一三共合作的肺癌药。

Image: Merck

图片:默沙东

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发