TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300229) Last Week's 5.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300229) Last Week's 5.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over TRS Information Technology by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership
- Institutional ownership in TRS Information Technology is 12%
- 零售投资者对拓尔思信息技术的重要掌控意味着普通公众有更多的权力来影响管理和治理决策。
- 公司分为25个投资者,共拥有46%的股份。
- 拓尔思信息技术的机构持股比例为12%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300229), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
了解拓尔思信息技术控制权真正所在的群体是十分重要的。拥有公司股份最多的群体,准确地说是约53%的零售投资者。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获得最大的收益(或者如果有下跌,则会损失最大)。
And following last week's 5.0% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.
在上周股价下跌5.0%之后,零售投资者遭受了最大亏损。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about TRS Information Technology.
让我们更加仔细地看看不同类型的股东对拓尔思信息技术的影响。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TRS Information Technology?
机构投资者对拓尔思信息技术有何启示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
TRS Information Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of TRS Information Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
拓尔思信息技术已经有机构投资者持股。在投资社区中,这可能意味着公司有一定的信誉度。但是,过度依赖被机构投资者认可的验证是有风险的。机构投资者有时也会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,股价下跌也不是罕见的情况。因此,值得检查拓尔思信息技术的过去盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,还有其他要考虑的因素。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in TRS Information Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Xinke Interactive Technology Development Co., Ltd. with 28% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.5% and 3.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对拓尔思信息技术而言,对冲基金持有的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,持有公司已发行股份最多的是新科互动技术发展有限公司,占总发行股份的28%。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有总发行股份的5.5%和3.6%。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of TRS Information Technology
拓尔思信息技术的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in TRS Information Technology Co., Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CN¥143m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股东可能会有兴趣了解内部人是否拥有拓尔思信息技术的股份。内部人拥有的有意义的股份价值14.3亿人民币。这被许多人看作是真正的好事情。大多数人会说这表明股东和董事会的利益是一致的。不过,检查一下这些内部人是否一直在抛售也是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in TRS Information Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有拓尔思信息技术53%的股份,表明这是一只相当受欢迎的股票。由于持有这么多股份,零售投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策上发挥集体作用,例如股息政策和董事会成员的任命。他们还可以行使权力对收购或并购进行投票,即使这可能不会提高公司的盈利能力。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 34%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到私人企业拥有已发行股份的34%。 私人企业可能是关联方。 有时,内部人员通过控股私有公司而对一家上市公司产生利益,而不是以个人身份控股。 虽然很难得出任何笼统的结论,但值得注意的是进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for TRS Information Technology that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了对拓尔思信息技术存在2个警告信号,这是您应该注意的。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。