The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809) Insiders Who Own 55% of the Company
The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809) Insiders Who Own 55% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Chengdu Haoneng Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 7 shareholders own 53% of the company
- 14% of Chengdu Haoneng Technology is held by Institutions
- 豪能股份股权中存在重要内部控制因素,这表明对公司成长存在既得利益。
- 前7大股东拥有公司53%的股份
- 机构持有豪能股份14%的股份。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603809), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解控制豪能股份股票的真正掌握方,重要的是要理解该业务的所有权结构。持有55%所有权的是个人内部人群。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这些股东将获益最多(如果出现下降,他们的损失也最大)。
And following last week's 9.5% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
上周股价下跌9.5%,内部人员遭受最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chengdu Haoneng Technology.
让我们更仔细地了解不同类型的股东对豪能股份说了什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Haoneng Technology?
机构持股给我们关于豪能股份的什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Chengdu Haoneng Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu Haoneng Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,豪能股份确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有该公司股票的一部分。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度,但最好还是谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的认可。他们有时也会出错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价下跌是很常见的。所以值得查看豪能股份的过去收益轨迹(如下所述)。当然,也要记住有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chengdu Haoneng Technology. Our data shows that Chao Dong Xiang is the largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.9% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Zhang Yong is the owner of 4.3% of the company's shares.
对豪能股份而言,对冲基金持有的股份不多。我们的数据显示,董超祥是最大的股东,持有该公司18%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持股约为10%和6.9%。此外,张勇CEO持有公司股份的4.3%。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
股东可能会对内部持有Affirm Holdings股份的人感兴趣。内部持股者拥有价值6.16亿美元的实质性利益,我们有时会关注他们是否一直在买卖。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Haoneng Technology
豪能股份内部人员持有超过一半的所有权,这使他们有效地掌控了公司。考虑到其市值为44亿元人民币,这意味着他们拥有24亿元的股份。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资,您可以免费发现他们是否一直在买卖。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Chengdu Haoneng Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥4.4b, that means they have CN¥2.4b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
总是值得考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体。但是要更好地了解豪能股份,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,考虑到风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现豪能股份有3个警示信号,您应该了解。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司持有30%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽略。虽然拥有这种所有权的规模可能不足以使决策在他们的利益中而翻转,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Chengdu Haoneng Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Chengdu Haoneng Technology you should know about.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。