share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease BancFirst Corporation (NASDAQ:BANF) Institutional Owners After Losing 1.5% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease BancFirst Corporation (NASDAQ:BANF) Institutional Owners After Losing 1.5% Over the Past Year

最近的涨势可能会安抚BancFirst Corporation(纳斯达克:bancfirst银行)机构股东,在过去的一年中损失了1.5%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/19 06:42

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in BancFirst implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构大量持有BancFirst银行的股份,意味着他们对公司的股价有着重大影响。
  • 前4大股东拥有该公司的52%。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of BancFirst Corporation (NASDAQ:BANF) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

观察BancFirst公司(NASDAQ:BANF)的股东可以告诉我们哪些群体最有权力。我们可以看到机构拥有该公司51%的股权。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 9.4% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 1.5%.

如果考虑到机构投资者在过去一年的损失总计为1.5%,他们会对最近一周股价上涨9.4%感到满意。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of BancFirst, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入挖掘一下BancFirst的各类股东情况,首先从下面的图表入手。

big
NasdaqGS:BANF Ownership Breakdown July 19th 2024
纳斯达克:BANF所有权拆分报告2024年7月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BancFirst?

机构投资者持股情况对于BancFirst有何指示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that BancFirst does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at BancFirst's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到BancFirst确实有机构投资者,他们持有该公司股票的一部分。这表明公司在投资社区中具有一定程度的信誉,然而最好还是警惕对于机构投资者的所谓确认所带来的风险。他们有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对于某个股票的看法,你会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看一看BancFirst下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正的关键。

big
NasdaqGS:BANF Earnings and Revenue Growth July 19th 2024
纳斯达克:BANF收益和营业收入增长情况报告2024年7月19日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in BancFirst. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is David Rainbolt (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 31% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者持有超过半数的已发行股份,董事会可能会注意到他们的偏好。对于BancFirst银行,对冲基金则没有太多的股份。从我们的数据中,我们可以推断出最大的股东是David Rainbolt(也担任最高管理职务),持有该公司31%的已发行股份。当内部人持有公司的大量股份时,通常被认为是一个好迹象,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人扮演重要的利益相关者角色。要知道,第二大股东持有约8.3%的已发行股份,第三大股东则持有6.5%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察发现,前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对该公司的决策有重要的发言权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

尽管有道理去研究一家公司的机构所有权数据,但了解分析师的观点也很有道理,以便知道市场的风向。由于相当多的分析师涵盖了该股票,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of BancFirst

BancFirst银行的内部人持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in BancFirst Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$3.3b, and insiders have US$1.1b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们的信息表明,内部人在BancFirst银行持有大量股份。它的市值仅有3亿美元,而内部人自有买进股票价值达到1.1亿美元。这相当可观。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会正在与他们一同投资。您可以查看这个免费的图表以显示内部交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over BancFirst. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持股15%的普通公众或个体投资者对于BancFirst银行也有一定的影响力。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决策,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for BancFirst (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我发现了解一个公司的真正所有者很有趣,但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现BancFirst银行存在两个预警信号(其中一个有点不愉快!)在这里投资前需要了解这些信息。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发