share_log

With 82% Ownership of the Shares, Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 82% Ownership of the Shares, Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

veeva systems公司(纽交所:VEEV)拥有82%的股权,严重受到机构投资者的控制。
Simply Wall St ·  07/19 07:35

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Veeva Systems' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 17 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 考虑到机构对Veeva systems的股权持有,其股票价格很可能会受到其交易决策的影响。
  • 前17名股东拥有该公司的50%股份。
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

Every investor in Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE:VEEV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每位投资Veeva Systems Inc.(纽交所:VEEV)的投资者都应了解最强势的股东团体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司82%的所有权,这意味着股东面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力,因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Veeva Systems.

让我们更仔细地看一下有关Veeva Systems的不同类型股东可以向我们传达哪些信息。

big
NYSE:VEEV Ownership Breakdown July 19th 2024
纽交所:VEEV所有权拆分 2024年7月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Veeva Systems?

机构持股对Veeva Systems有何启示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Veeva Systems does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Veeva Systems' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Veeva Systems确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的相当比例。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好仍然注意不要过于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证,因为他们有时也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,你可能会看到股票价格迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Veeva Systems下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:VEEV Earnings and Revenue Growth July 19th 2024
纽交所:VEEV收益和营收增长 2024年7月19日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Veeva Systems. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.6% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Peter Gassner, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

由于机构投资者持有超过半数已发行股票,因此董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到,对于Veeva Systems,对冲基金没有重大投资。通过查看我们的数据,我们可以看到,最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,拥有8.8%的已发行股份。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有7.6%和6.2%的已发行股份。Peter Gassner是第二大股东,同时也担任首席执行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前17名股东在该公司拥有50%的持股,这意味着没有单一股东对公司拥有显著的控制力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Veeva Systems

Veeva Systems的内部股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Veeva Systems Inc.. Insiders own US$2.4b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股东可能会有兴趣了解内部人士在Veeva Systems Inc.中的持股情况。内部人士持有价值24亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到这种投资水平真是太好了。您可以在此处检查这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,包括零售投资者,拥有公司的10%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在其方面左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发