share_log

Great Week for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) Institutional Investors After Losing 36% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) Institutional Investors After Losing 36% Over the Previous Year

自上一年度以来,开放房地产科技公司(纳斯达克:OPEN)机构投资者损失了36%,但上周表现出色。
Simply Wall St ·  07/19 09:27

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Opendoor Technologies' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构持有股权较高意味着Opendoor Technologies的股价对机构的交易行为敏感。
  • 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Opendoor Technologies Inc.(NASDAQ:OPEN)的股东,就可以知道哪个团体最强大。持有公司最多股份的团体,确切来说是约60%的机构。换句话说,该团体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Last week's US$353m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 36% losses.

上周Opendoor Technologies的市值增加了35300万美元,这可能会得到机构投资者的赞赏,特别是在一年亏损36%之后。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Opendoor Technologies.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对Opendoor Technologies(开放公司)能提供什么信息。

big
NasdaqGS:OPEN Ownership Breakdown July 19th 2024
纳斯达克:OPEN所有权分布2024年7月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Opendoor Technologies?

机构持有说明Opendoor Technologies的股票受到了相当一部分机构分析师的欢迎。当然,他们也可能是错的。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,了解Opendoor Technologies的收益历史很重要。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Opendoor Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Opendoor Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

纳斯达克:OPEN收入和盈利增长2024年7月19日

big
NasdaqGS:OPEN Earnings and Revenue Growth July 19th 2024
机构投资者持有该公司超过50%的股份,因此他们一起可以强烈影响董事会的决策。对Opendoor Technologies,对冲基金没有太多的股份。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持股13%。Access Industries,Inc.和BlackRock,Inc.的持股量分别为7.8%和7.2%,是第二和第三大股东。此外,该公司的CEO Carrie Wheeler直接持有公司全部已发行股份的2.2%。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Opendoor Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 13%. With 7.8% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Access Industries, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Carrie Wheeler directly holds 2.2% of the total shares outstanding.

Opendoor Technologies的内部持股人。我们可以报告说,内部人员确实拥有Opendoor Technologies Inc.的股份。这是一家大型公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性很好。内部人员持有价值6700万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内部人员一致性的问题,可以单击此处查看内部人员是否一直在买卖。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据的进一步研究表明,前13大股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Opendoor Technologies

我们可以看到私人公司拥有已发行股份的7.8%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时,内部人员通过持有私人公司而不是以个人身份持有公共公司来对公共公司产生利益。尽管难以得出任何广泛的结论,但还是值得注意作为进一步研究的一个方面。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Opendoor Technologies Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$67m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我觉得看看一个公司到底是谁拥有很有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如风险- Opendoor Technologies有3个警告信号,我们认为您应该了解一下。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

虽然考虑到拥有一家公司的不同集团是值得的,但还有更重要的因素。比如:我们已经发现了一条辛蒙斯第一国家银行的警告信号,你应该知道。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 7.8%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到私人公司持有已发行股份的7.8%。私人公司可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而不是以个人的身份对一家公开公司产生利益。尽管很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意作为后续研究的一个领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Opendoor Technologies has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

Opendoor Technologies的私人公司。我们可以看到私人公司拥有已发行股份的7.8%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时,内部人员通过持有私人公司而不是以个人身份持有公共公司来对公共公司产生利益。尽管难以得出任何广泛的结论,但还是值得注意作为进一步研究的一个方面。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发