share_log

Painful Week for Individual Investors Invested in Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) After 3.9% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Individual Investors Invested in Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) After 3.9% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

纽交所个人投资者在荷兰兄弟公司(NYSE:BROS)投资的痛苦周,股价下跌3.9%,机构也遭受损失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/20 08:21

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Dutch Bros' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 28% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 荷兰兄弟拥有大量个人投资者所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 共有25名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为28%
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

Every investor in Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

荷兰兄弟公司(纽约证券交易所代码:BROS)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为60%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

While institutions who own 37% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$6.8b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

尽管上周市值跌至68亿美元后,持有37%的机构承受了压力,但个人投资者蒙受的损失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dutch Bros.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于荷兰兄弟的什么。

big
NYSE:BROS Ownership Breakdown July 20th 2024
纽约证券交易所:BROS 所有权明细 2024 年 7 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dutch Bros?

关于荷兰兄弟,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Dutch Bros already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Dutch Bros' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

荷兰兄弟已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到荷兰兄弟的历史收入和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

big
NYSE:BROS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 20th 2024
纽约证券交易所:BROS收益和收入增长 2024年7月20日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dutch Bros. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 3.6% of shares outstanding. Citadel Advisors LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 2.7% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 2.4% of the company stock.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对荷兰兄弟进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已发行股份占3.6%。Citadel Advisors LLC是第二大股东,拥有2.7%的普通股,FMR LLC持有该公司约2.4%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Dutch Bros

荷兰兄弟的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Dutch Bros Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$192m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有荷兰兄弟公司的部分股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约1.92亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 60% of Dutch Bros. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有荷兰兄弟60%的股份。这种规模的所有权赋予了公众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以而且可能确实会影响有关高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议业务收购的决策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Dutch Bros that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了荷兰兄弟的两个警告信号,在这里投资之前,您应该注意这些信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发