Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Arcosa, Inc. (NYSE:ACA) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
巴菲特的合伙人Charlie Munger支持的外部基金经理Li Lu曾明确表示,“最大的投资风险不在于价格波动,而在于您是否会遭受永久性资本损失。”因此,当您考虑一只股票的风险时,需要考虑其债务,因为过多的债务可以致使一家公司沉没。不过,Arcosa, Inc. (NYSE:ACA)确实有债务。但股东们是否应该担心其使用债务呢?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
债务带来了什么风险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
当企业无法通过自由现金流或以有吸引力的价格筹集资本来轻松地满足债务义务时,债务和其他负债对企业变得有风险。在最坏的情况下,一家公司无法偿还债权人的债务将会破产。但更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,一家公司必须以非常低的价格发行股票,以永久性地稀释股东,以弥补其资产负债表的不足。当然,债务可以成为企业的重要工具,尤其是在资本性企业中。考虑企业使用多少债务时,首先要做的是将其现金和债务合并在一起看。
How Much Debt Does Arcosa Carry?
Arcosa承载了多少债务?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 Arcosa had debt of US$595.8m, up from US$531.8m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$176.5m, its net debt is less, at about US$419.3m.
下面的图片(可单击以获取更详细信息)显示,截至2024年3月,Arcosa的债务为5,958万美元,高于一年前的5,318万美元。但由于其拥有1,765万美元的现金储备,因此其净债务为约41,930万美元。
How Healthy Is Arcosa's Balance Sheet?
Arcosa的资产负债表状况如何?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Arcosa had liabilities of US$434.9m due within a year, and liabilities of US$859.4m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$176.5m in cash and US$366.2m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$751.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,Arcosa短期负债为4,349万美元,超过1年内到期的负债为8,594万美元。与此同时,该公司拥有1,765万美元的现金和3,662万美元的应收账款,在12个月内到期。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的组合多751.6万美元。
Given Arcosa has a market capitalization of US$4.32b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
考虑到Arcosa的市值为4.32亿美元,很难相信这些负债会造成太大的威胁。但是我们认为股东们应该继续监控公司的资产负债表。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。
Arcosa has net debt of just 1.2 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And it boasts interest cover of 7.4 times, which is more than adequate. And we also note warmly that Arcosa grew its EBIT by 11% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Arcosa's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Arcosa的净债务为1.2倍的EBITDA,表明它绝不是不负责任的借款人。它的利息覆盖倍数高达7.4倍,足以应对。我们也热切地注意到,Arcosa去年的EBIT增长了11%,这使得其债务负担更容易处理。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显然的起点。但是,更重要的是未来的收益将决定Arcosa维持健康的资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看此免费报告,其中显示了分析师的盈利预测。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Arcosa recorded free cash flow of 48% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
但是我们的最后一个考虑也很重要,因为公司无法用纸上盈利来支付债务;它需要冷硬的现金。因此,我们始终会检查EBIT中有多少转化为自由现金流。从最近三年的数据来看,Arcosa的自由现金流仅为其EBIT的48%,这比我们预期的要弱。这种疲弱的现金转化率使得处理负债变得更加困难。
Our View
我们的观点
On this analysis, Arcosa's net debt to EBITDA was a real positive, just like an unsolicited gift of cupcakes from a work colleague. And its EBIT growth rate should also leave shareholders feeling frolicsome. All these things considered, it appears that Arcosa can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Arcosa has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
在此分析中,Arcosa的净债务与EBITDA的比例是一项真正的优势,就像同事送来的杯子蛋糕一样。其EBIT增长率也应让股东们感到欣喜。考虑到这些因素,Arcosa似乎可以轻松处理其当前的债务水平。当然,虽然这种杠杆可以增强股本回报,但它也带来了更多风险,因此值得关注。在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是关注的重点。但最终,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表之外的风险。例如-Arcosa存在2个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。