share_log

Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

伊利莎白·莉莉(NYSE:LLY)似乎相当明智地使用债务。
Simply Wall St ·  07/20 10:05

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性与风险远非同义词。” 因此,当您考虑任何给定股票有多大风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会拖垮一家公司。我们可以看到,礼来公司(NYSE:LLY)在其业务中确实使用债务。但是,股东们是否应该担心它的债务使用?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

当企业无法轻松通过自由现金流或以优惠的价格筹集资金来履行债务和其他负债时,债务和其他负债将对企业构成风险。创业板的一部分是“创造性破坏”的过程,其中由其银行家无情清算失败的企业。然而,更常见的(但仍然昂贵的)情况是,一家公司必须以便宜的股价稀释股东,只是为了控制债务。然而,通过取代股权稀释,债务可以成为那些需要资金以高投资回报率进行增长的企业的极好工具。在考虑债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平。

What Is Eli Lilly's Net Debt?

礼来的净债务是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Eli Lilly had US$26.3b of debt, an increase on US$19.0b, over one year. However, it does have US$2.65b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$23.7b.

您可以点击下面的图形查看历史数据,但它显示,截至2024年3月,礼来有263亿美元的债务,较去年增加了19亿美元。然而,它有26.5亿美元的现金抵消这笔债务,导致净债务约为237亿美元。

big
NYSE:LLY Debt to Equity History July 20th 2024
NYSE:LLY的权益与负债历史。2024年7月20日

How Healthy Is Eli Lilly's Balance Sheet?

礼来公司的资产负债表健康状况如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Eli Lilly had liabilities of US$18.6b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$32.4b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$2.65b in cash and US$9.87b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$38.5b.

专注于最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到礼来有186亿美元的负债在12个月内到期,而超过这一期限的负债为324亿美元。抵消这一点的是,它有26.5亿美元的现金和98.7亿美元的应收账款,这些是在12个月内到期的。因此,其负债超过现金和(短期)应收款项的总和385亿美元。

Given Eli Lilly has a humongous market capitalization of US$764.4b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考虑到礼来的巨额市值为7644亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成多大的威胁。话虽如此,显然我们应继续监测其资产负债表,以免情况恶化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。

We'd say that Eli Lilly's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.8), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its strong interest cover of 31.3 times, makes us even more comfortable. It is well worth noting that Eli Lilly's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 53% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Eli Lilly's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

我们可以说,礼来公司适度的净债务至税息折旧及摊销前利润(EBITDA)比率(为1.8),表明其在债务方面非常谨慎。其强大的利息覆盖率达到31.3倍,让我们甚至更加放心。值得注意的是,最近12个月,礼来公司的EBIT逐涨,增长了53%。这将使其更容易管理其债务。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是明显的起点。但与其说是资产负债表,不如说是未来的盈利将更多地决定礼来公司维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份免费的分析报告,其中包含分析师的利润预测。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Eli Lilly recorded free cash flow of 26% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最后,虽然税务人员可能喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受冷酷的现金。因此,逻辑上应该查看与实际自由现金流匹配的EBIT的比例。查看最近三年,礼来公司录得的自由现金流占EBIT的比例为26%,这比我们预期的要弱。在偿还债务方面并不理想。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Eli Lilly's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But truth be told we feel its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow does undermine this impression a bit. Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that Eli Lilly takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Eli Lilly that you should be aware of.

令人欣慰的是,礼来公司令人印象深刻的利息覆盖率表明它具有掌控债务的优势。但实话实说,我们认为其将EBIT转换为自由现金流的能力有些削弱这种印象。综合考虑所有这些数据,我们认为礼来公司在处理债务方面采取了相当明智的做法。这意味着他们承担了更多的风险,希望提高股东的回报率。显示公司资产负债表的内容,很清楚这是分析债务时需要关注的领域。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中——远非如此。例如,我们已经发现了两个警告信号,您应该了解它们。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

说到底,有时更容易关注那些甚至不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费查看零净债务增长股票列表,立即获得。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发