share_log

Institutional Investors in Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

纳斯达克:Nova有限公司的机构投资者上周损失了14%,但受益于长期的创业板增长。
Simply Wall St ·  07/21 09:00

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Nova's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考虑到机构对 Nova 股票的持有量较大,因此他们的交易决策可能会对 Nova 的股价产生影响。
  • 共有14名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,占有50%的所有权。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道谁真正掌控了Nova有限公司的控制权(纳斯达克股票代码:NVMI),那么您必须看一下该公司的股权登记簿组成。占比最高的是机构,占有79%的股份。 换句话说,该组织的投资在公司中可能赚得最多(或损失最多)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 14% in value last week. However, the 78% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

没有股东希望在投资中亏钱,尤其是看到他们的持股上周价值下跌14%的机构投资者。然而,78%的一年回报可能已经缓解了它们的总体损失。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nova.

下图是对 Nova 的不同所有权集团进行放大的分析。

big
NasdaqGS:NVMI Ownership Breakdown July 21st 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:NVMI 2024年7月21日的所有权结构分解

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nova?

机构所有权告诉我们 Nova 的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Nova already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nova's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Nova 已经被机构持有。他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这表明专业投资者对公司的认可。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时会犯错,就像所有人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的 Nova 盈利历史记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:NVMI Earnings and Revenue Growth July 21st 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:NVMI 2024年7月21日的盈利和营业收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Nova is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 10.0%. With 9.0% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wasatch Advisors LP and Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有超过股份发行量一半以上的股票,因此董事会可能会注意到他们的偏好。Nova 没有被对冲基金所拥有。该公司最大的股东是 FMR LLC,股权占比为10.0%。 持有9.0%和4.4%的已发行股份,Wasatch Advisors LP 和 Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd 分别是第二和第三大股东。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前14名股东合计持有该公司的50%股权,表明没有单一股东对该公司有重大控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Nova

Nova 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们的数据无法确认董事会成员是否持有个人股份。董事会成员至少持有一些个人股份是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行动是检查CEO的薪资。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nova. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

占有21%的普通公众股东,大多由个人投资者组成,对 Nova 有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不能决策,但它肯定能对公司的运行产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发