share_log

Does W.W. Grainger (NYSE:GWW) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does W.W. Grainger (NYSE:GWW) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

美国固安捷(纽交所:GWW)的资产负债表健康吗?
Simply Wall St ·  07/21 09:09

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

霍华德·马克斯说得很好,他说,与其担心股价波动,不如担心永久性损失的风险,我认为......每个实践的投资者都会担心。因此,当您考虑某只股票有多大风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会拖垮一家公司。重要的是,W.W. Grainger,Inc.(NYSE:GWW)确实承担了一笔债务。但真正的问题是,这笔债务是否使公司变得冒险。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务带来了什么风险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务对于企业有所帮助,直到企业无法再用新的资本或自由现金流偿还债务时。如果情况真的非常糟糕,债权人可以控制企业。然而,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是公司必须以低廉的股票价格稀释股东权益,以便控制债务。当然,使用债务的好处在于它通常代表着廉价资本,尤其是当债务用于替代在可获得高回报的公司中稀释股东权益时。当我们考虑一家公司的债务使用情况时,我们首先看现金和债务的结合。

What Is W.W. Grainger's Debt?

W.W. Grainger的债务是什么?

As you can see below, W.W. Grainger had US$2.30b of debt, at March 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$804.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.49b.

如下所示,W.W. Grainger在2024年3月有23亿美元的债务,与前一年大致相同。您可以单击图表以获得更详细信息。但是,它也有8040万美元的现金,因此其净债务为14.9亿美元。

big
NYSE:GWW Debt to Equity History July 21st 2024
债务/股本历史记录 / GWW NYSE-2024年7月21日

How Strong Is W.W. Grainger's Balance Sheet?

W.W. Grainger的资产负债表强度如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that W.W. Grainger had liabilities of US$2.53b due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.36b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$804.0m and US$2.33b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$1.76b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,W.W. Grainger的一年内到期的负债总额为25.3亿美元,到期后还款的负债总额为23.6亿美元。另一方面,它有8040万美元的现金和23.3亿美元的一年内到期的应收账款。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的组合高出1.76亿美元。

Of course, W.W. Grainger has a titanic market capitalization of US$46.4b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

当然,W.W. Grainger拥有464亿美元的巨大市值,因此这些负债可能是可以管理的。但是有足够的负债,我们肯定会建议股东继续关注资产负债表的情况。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。

W.W. Grainger has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.53. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 28.9 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Fortunately, W.W. Grainger grew its EBIT by 8.0% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if W.W. Grainger can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

W.W. Grainger的净债务/EBITDA比率仅为0.53。其EBIt覆盖其利息费用高达28.9倍。因此,您可以认为它所面临的债务风险不会比大象面临老鼠更大。幸运的是,W.W. Grainger在过去一年中将其EBIt增加了8.0%,这使得负债负担看起来更加可控。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到大多数债务。但是,最终业务未来的盈利能力将决定W.W. Grainger能否随时间加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看此免费报告,其中包含分析师利润预测。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, W.W. Grainger produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 53% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,公司需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润不足以胜任。因此,我们始终会检查多少EBIt转化为自由现金流。在过去三年中,W.W. Grainger产生了牢固的自由现金流,相当于其EBIt的53%,大约符合我们的预期。这笔实打实的现金意味着它可以在想要偿还债务时减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

The good news is that W.W. Grainger's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like W.W. Grainger is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for W.W. Grainger that you should be aware of.

好消息是,W.W. Grainger有能力使用其EBIt来支付其利息费用,而这使我们像毛绒绒的小狗一样高兴。而且,它的净债务/EBITDA也非常令人振奋。考虑到以上因素的范围,看起来W.W. Grainger在利用债务方面相当明智。这意味着他们冒了更大的风险,希望提高股东的回报率。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是开始的明显位置。然而,并不是所有的投资风险都在资产负债表中-远非如此。例如,我们已经确定了W.W. Grainger的一项警告信号,希望您能注意到。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

当然,如果您是那种喜欢购买没有负债负担的股票的投资者,则今天就可以发现我们的独家净现金增长股清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发