Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 34% of the Company
Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 34% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ferrari's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 11% of Ferrari is held by insiders
- 机构股东持有股份较高意味着法拉利的股票价格对他们的交易行为很敏感。
- 共有12名投资者拥有公司的大部分股权,拥有50%的所有权。
- 法拉利有11%的内部持股。
If you want to know who really controls Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 34% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解谁真正控制着法拉利N.V.(纽交所:RACE),那么您需要查看其股权登记册的构成。机构拥有公司的最多股份,占34%。也就是说,该机构在其投资中获得最大利润(或损失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferrari, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究法拉利的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240723/0-dd5030ec7cff872212181b4bb9d42c32-0-37dcaa8c385e65e40e7879339ae7d600.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferrari?
机构股权告诉我们法拉利的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Ferrari does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ferrari, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看出,法拉利确实拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司的大部分股票。这可以表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,过度依赖机构投资者的所谓验证是值得警惕的。他们有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,最好检查法拉利的过去收益轨迹(下面)。当然,也要记住考虑其他因素。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240723/0-dd5030ec7cff872212181b4bb9d42c32-1-9077e6017661da804ef509526772b487.png/big)
Ferrari is not owned by hedge funds. Giovanni Agnelli B.V. is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. Piero Ferrari is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Baillie Gifford & Co. holds about 3.4% of the company stock.
法拉利不是由对冲基金拥有。吉奥瓦尼·阿涅利b.V.目前是最大的股东,持有公司流通股的25%。皮耶罗·法拉利是第二大股东,拥有普通股的11%,Baillie Gifford & Co.持有约3.4%的公司股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我们对所有权的深入研究表明,前12名股东合计拥有50%的持股,意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
尽管有道理去研究一家公司的机构所有权数据,但了解分析师的观点也很有道理,以便知道市场的风向。由于相当多的分析师涵盖了该股票,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Ferrari
法拉利的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Ferrari N.V.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$7.9b stake in this US$75b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起来内部人员拥有法拉利N.V.的相当大比例。看到内部人员在这家750亿美元企业中持有意义重大的79亿美元的股份非常有趣。大多数人会认为这显示了控股股东的良好管理,尤其是在这种规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
尽管考虑不同拥有公司的团体是值得的,但有些因素更为重要。例如,我们已经为中国医药系统控股公司确定了2个警示信号,您应该注意到这些信号。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 25%, of the Ferrari stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起来私人公司拥有法拉利股票的25%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而非个人容量来对公共公司投资有利。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是这是一个进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ferrari better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑到一个公司的股权归属情况始终是值得思考的。但要更好地了解法拉利,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。