share_log

China Post Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688648) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 13% Last Week

China Post Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688648) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 13% Last Week

中国邮政科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688648)最大股东是在股价上涨13%后富裕起来的私人公司。
Simply Wall St ·  20:24

Key Insights

关键见解

  • China Post Technology's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 62% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 11% of China Post Technology
  • 中国邮政科技拥有大量私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 62% 的业务由前两名股东持有
  • 机构拥有中国邮政科技11%的股份

Every investor in China Post Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688648) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

中国邮政科技股份有限公司(SHSE: 688648)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为55%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.2b market cap following a 13% gain in the stock.

结果,上周私营公司总得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨13%后达到32元人民币。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Post Technology.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关中国邮政科技的哪些信息。

big
SHSE:688648 Ownership Breakdown July 24th 2024
SHSE: 688648 所有权明细 2024 年 7 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Post Technology?

关于中国邮政科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

China Post Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Post Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

中邮科技已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到中国邮政科技的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

big
SHSE:688648 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 24th 2024
SHSE: 688648 2024 年 7 月 24 日收益和收入增长

China Post Technology is not owned by hedge funds. China Post Group Corporation Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 49% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 2.6% of the stock.

中邮科技不归对冲基金所有。中国邮政集团有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份49%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约13%和2.6%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 62% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细研究表明,两位大股东通过其62%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of China Post Technology

中国邮政科技的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们注意到,我们的数据并未显示任何董事会成员个人持有股份。董事会成员不持有至少部分个人持股的情况很少见,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。一个不错的下一步是检查首席执行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有该公司21%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决策,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 13%, private equity firms could influence the China Post Technology board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有13%的股份,可能会影响中国邮政科技董事会。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 55%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据表明,私营公司持有公司55%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果内部人士等关联方对其中一家私营公司感兴趣,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for China Post Technology you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们发现了一个你应该注意的中国邮政科技警告标志。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发