Zhejiang Zhongjian Technology Co.,Ltd's (SZSE:002779) Market Cap Rose CN¥408m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 34% Profited and so Did Insiders
Zhejiang Zhongjian Technology Co.,Ltd's (SZSE:002779) Market Cap Rose CN¥408m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 34% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Insiders own 32% of Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd
- 中坚科技有限公司被多家私营企业持有的大量股份表明他们在管理和业务策略方面共同拥有更大的话语权。
- 前4大股东拥有该公司的52%。
- 内部人士持有32%的中坚科技有限公司股份。
A look at the shareholders of Zhejiang Zhongjian Technology Co.,Ltd (SZSE:002779) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 34% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看中坚科技有限公司(SZSE:002779)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。私营企业持有公司的最大股份,占34%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While private companies were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 12% price gain, insiders also received a 32% cut.
尽管私营公司是上周12%股价上涨后获得最多收益的集团,但内部人士也获得了32%的收益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨中坚科技有限公司的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd?
机构投资者有相当多的中坚科技有限公司股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但仅凭这一事实就不能依靠机构,因为有时候机构也会做出糟糕的投资决策。当多个机构持有一只股票时,就存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易失败时,多个当事方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到中坚科技有限公司的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事不止如此。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
SZSE:002779收益和营收增长 (2024年7月25日公布)
Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Zhongjian Electromechanical Group Co., Ltd. with 32% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Minggen Wu, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
中坚科技有限公司的内部人士持有相当比例的股份。内部人士在这家38亿元的公司中持有12亿元人民币的股份。我们会说这表明他们与股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然非常小;一些内部人士可能已经创立了这家公司。您可以点击此处查看这些内部人士是否一直在买入或抛售。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察发现,前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对该公司的决策有重要的发言权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。分析师观点也可以达到相同的目的。我们的信息表明,这只股票没有任何分析师覆盖,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd
持有26%股份的普通公众股东对中坚科技有限公司有一定的影响力,大多数股东是个人投资者。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zhejiang Zhongjian Technology Co.,Ltd. Insiders have a CN¥1.2b stake in this CN¥3.8b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
中坚科技有限公司的内部人士拥有相当比例的股份。内部人士在这家38亿元的公司中持有12亿元人民币的股份。我们会说这表明他们与股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然非常小;一些内部人士可能已经创立了这家公司。您可以点击此处查看这些内部人士是否一直在买入或抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
持有26%股份的普通公众股东对中坚科技有限公司有一定的影响力,大多数股东是个人投资者。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 34%, of the Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私营企业拥有Zhejiang Zhongjian TechnologyLtd股份的34%。私营企业可能是相关方。有时内幕人士通过持有私企股份而不是以个人的身份,对公众公司表现出其利益。虽然很难从中得出任何普遍性的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。