Institutional Investors of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 4.7% Drop
Institutional Investors of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 4.7% Drop
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Worthington Steel's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 3 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构持有大量的Worthington Steel股份,这意味着其股价对机构的交易行为很敏感。
- 前 3 名股东拥有公司的 50%。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着Worthington Steel, Inc. (纽交所:WS),那么你需要看看其股份注册成分。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有54%的股份。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And last week, institutional endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.7%.
上周,机构遭受了最大的损失,因为股票下跌了4.7%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Worthington Steel.
在下面的图表中,我们将放大 Worthington Steel 的不同股权组。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240725/0-69aeabf0a0b695b2e9656723fe724d0a-0-85bba19ab91be37e303d04ced9806a83.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Worthington Steel?
机构持有情况告诉我们 Worthington Steel 的什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Worthington Steel does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Worthington Steel's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到,Worthington Steel 确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司的很大一部分股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了股票并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变他们对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得看看 Worthington Steel 下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240725/0-69aeabf0a0b695b2e9656723fe724d0a-1-43dca71b6a01ba3933ed618c14cde469.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Worthington Steel is not owned by hedge funds. John McConnell is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 10% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Geoffrey Gilmore is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,所以他们可以集体行使重要的权力。Worthington Steel没有被对冲基金所拥有。约翰·麦康奈尔(John McConnell)目前是该公司最大的股东,持有29%的流通股。为了提供上下文,第二大股东持有约11%的流通股,第三大股东持有约10%的所有权。此外,CEO Geoffrey Gilmore拥有公司0.6%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Worthington Steel
Worthington Steel 的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Worthington Steel, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$570m stake in this US$1.8b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士保持了 Worthington Steel, Inc. 的显著持股。看到内部人士在这个价值18亿美元的公司中持有着有意义的5700万美元的股份,这是非常有趣的。大多数人会说,特别是在这样一个规模的公司中,这显示了与股东的良好对齐。您可以在这里查看这些内幕人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Worthington Steel. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是个人投资者的一般公众持有Worthington Steel的15%的股份。 股权的规模虽然相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Worthington Steel that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同组群是值得的,但存在着更为重要的其他因素。例如,我们已经识别出 Worthington Steel 的 2 个警示信号,你需要注意一下。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。