After Losing 4.3% in the Past Year, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (NASDAQ:IMKT.A) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain
After Losing 4.3% in the Past Year, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (NASDAQ:IMKT.A) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Ingles Markets implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 安格莱斯市场的机构大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响。
- 前六大股东持有该业务的50%股份。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (NASDAQ:IMKT.A) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看Ingles Markets, Incorporated (纳斯达克:IMKt.A)的股东,可以看出哪个团体最具影响力。我们可以看出,机构拥有该公司的大部分股权,持有64%。换句话说,该团体将从自己对公司的投资中获得最多(或失去最多)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 3.9% increase in the share price after a year of 4.3% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价上涨3.9%的消息,这是在一年4.3%的亏损后回升的迹象,表明投资回报率可能会开始上升。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ingles Markets, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究Ingles Markets的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ingles Markets?
机构持股情况告诉我们有关Ingles Markets的什么信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ingles Markets. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ingles Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在安格莱斯市场拥有相当多的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师看过这支股票,他们喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者在同时尝试抛售某个股票,股价下跌很多是很常见的。因此,值得注意的是,检查安格莱斯市场的过去盈利轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ingles Markets. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Robert Ingle with 22% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Dimensional Fund Advisors LP and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.2%.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股份,董事会很可能要关注他们的偏好。对安格莱斯市场,对冲基金没有多少股份。从数据来看,最大的股东是罗伯特·英格尔,持有22%的流通股份。第二大和第三大股东是Dimensional Fund Advisors LP和BlackRock, Inc.,他们的股份持有量相等,为6.2%。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前6大股东持有超过一半的股份登记簿,有一些较小的股东来平衡较大股东的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
尽管研究一家公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增添价值,但研究分析师建议以深入了解股票的预期表现也是一个好的做法。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此可能为人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Ingles Markets
安格莱斯市场的内部股权拥有情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Ingles Markets, Incorporated. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.5b, and insiders have US$324m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,安格莱斯市场,Incorporated的内部人士拥有相当大的股份。它的市值只有15亿美元,内部人员拥有3,240万美元的股份。这相当显著。大多数人会说,这表明该公司内部人员在股东方面拥有相当程度的一致性,特别是在这样一个规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众(包括散户投资者)拥有该公司的13%股份,因此不容忽视。虽然该群体不能决定,但肯定会对公司的运营产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Ingles Markets that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,在投资这里之前,我们发现了1个有关安格莱斯市场的警告信号。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。